切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 212 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2020.03.006

所属专题: 经典病例 经典病例 文献

论著

21例神经梅毒患者异常图形翻转视觉诱发电位分析
闫超玲1, 伍文清1, 王素梅1, 徐丹1, 孙鑫婕1, 许东梅1,()   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院神经内科;新发突发传染病研究北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-27 出版日期:2020-06-15
  • 通信作者: 许东梅
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院院内科研基金"启航计划"(No. DTQH201607)

Analysis of abnormal patterns reversal visual evoked potential (P-VEP) in 21 patients with neurosyphilis

Chaoling Yan1, Wenqing Wu1, Sumei Wang1, Dan Xu1, Xinjie Sun1, Dongmei Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Beijing 10015, China
  • Received:2020-01-27 Published:2020-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Dongmei Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Dongmei, Email:
引用本文:

闫超玲, 伍文清, 王素梅, 徐丹, 孙鑫婕, 许东梅. 21例神经梅毒患者异常图形翻转视觉诱发电位分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 212-217.

Chaoling Yan, Wenqing Wu, Sumei Wang, Dan Xu, Xinjie Sun, Dongmei Xu. Analysis of abnormal patterns reversal visual evoked potential (P-VEP) in 21 patients with neurosyphilis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 212-217.

目的

探讨图形翻转视觉诱发电位(P-VEP)在神经梅毒所致视神经损伤患者的早期诊断及病情评估中的应用价值。

方法

收集2016年1月至2019年12月于首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院完善P-VEP检查且P100波潜伏期异常的21例神经梅毒患者,分析其P-VEP结果、临床表现、脑脊液及血清指标的特点。

结果

21例P-VEP异常的神经梅毒患者中以男性患者多见(76%、16/21),平均年龄为(45.0 ± 11.5)岁。17例患者眼部症状阳性,4例患者眼部症状阴性。17例眼部症状阳性的患者均被诊断为视神经炎。P-VEP异常主要表现为P100波潜伏期延长或P100波缺失。患眼P100波潜伏期(135.16 ± 22.21)ms较正常眼潜伏期(92.75 ± 8.26)ms显著延长,差异有统计学意义(t =-2.813、P = 0.007)。眼部症状阳性的神经梅毒患者较症状阴性患者的P100波潜伏期更长[(137.94 ± 23.12)ms vs.(120.33 ± 5.50)ms],差异有统计学意义(t = 1.28、P = 0.217)。P100波潜伏期和脑脊液白细胞(r = 0.349、P = 0.155)及蛋白(r = 0.240、P = 0.323)间无显著相关性。追踪分析8例治疗后复查患者的临床资料,发现治疗前后P100波潜伏期变化与血清及脑脊液常规、生化指标间无显著相关性(P均> 0.05)。有5只患眼表现为P100波缺失,其在治疗后6个月内P100波仍缺失。

结论

神经梅毒患者P-VEP检查P100波潜伏期延长或波形缺失提示视神经损害;P100波波形缺失可能提示视神经损伤较为严重或不可逆转;在神经梅毒患者未出现视神经受损症状前即可通过检查P-VEP发现视神经受损,为明确神经梅毒患者是否存在视神经损伤及损伤程度提供一定依据。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of pattern reversal visual evoked potential (P-VEP) in early diagnosis and assessment of optic nerve injury caused by neurosyphilis.

Methods

Total of 21 neurosyphilis patients with abnormal P100 wave latency and with P-VEP examination in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2016 to December 2019 were collected and the P-VEP results, clinical manifestations, characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid and serum indicators were analyzed, respectively.

Results

Among the 21 patients with abnormal P-VEP, most were male (76%, 16/21). The mean age was (45.0 ± 11.5) years old. There were 17 patients with positive ocular symptoms and 4 patients with negative ocular symptoms. All patients with abnormal P-VEP neurosyphilis had optic nerve damage, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic. The abnormality of P-VEP was mainly manifested as prolonged latency of P100 wave. Of the abnormal eyes of P100 latency [(135.16 ± 22.21) ms] was significantly longer than that of normal eyes [(92.75 ± 8.26) ms], with significant difference (t =-2.813, P = 0.007). Patients with positive ocular symptoms had a longer latency of P100 wave [(137.94 ± 23.12) ms] than patients without ocular symptoms [(120.33 ± 5.50) ms], with significant difference (t = 1.28, P = 0.217). There was no correlation between P100 wave latency and white blood cells (r = 0.349, P = 0.155) and protein (r = 0.240, P = 0.323) of cerebrospinal fluid. The clinical data of 8 reexamined patients were analyzed and the changes of P100 wave latency were not consistent with the biochemical manifestations of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (all P > 0.05). Five of the eyes presented P100 wave absence, which did not improve during 6 months after treatment. P100 wave deletion may indicate that the optic nerve damage was irreversible.

Conclusions

Prolonged latency of P100 wave or absence of waveforms in patients with neurosyphilis may indicate optic nerve damage. The absence of a P100 wave form may indicate severe and irreversible optic nerve damage. Abnormal P-VEP may indicate neurosyphilis optic nerve damage earlier than clinical symptoms. It provides a basis for determining the optic nerve damage and the degree of damage in patients with neurosyphilis.

表1 21例P-VEP异常患者的一般资料
表2 神经梅毒患者42只眼P-VEP检查
图1 P100波潜伏期与脑脊液蛋白、白细胞Pearson相关性分析图
表3 8例神经梅毒患者初诊和复诊实验室指标
[1]
Puccio JA, Cannon A, Derasari K, et al. Resurgence of syphilis[J]. Adv Pediatr,2019,66:231-244.
[2]
Barnett R. Syphilis[J]. The Lancet,2018,391(10129):1471.
[3]
Chen ZQ, Zhang GC, Gong XD, et al. Syphilis in China: results of a national surveillance programme[J]. Lancet,2007,369(9556):132-138.
[4]
Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Summary of 2015 CDC Treatment Guidelines[J]. J Miss State Med Assoc,2015,56(12):372-375.
[5]
Tsuboi M, Nishijima T, Yashiro S, et al. Prognosis of ocular syphilis in patients infected with HIV in the antiretroviral therapy era[J]. Sex Transm Infect,2016,92(8):605-610.
[6]
蒋俊青, 李维云. 二期梅毒眼损害误诊为糖尿病眼病1例[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2013.29(11):722.
[7]
高英, 顾昕, 管志芳, 等 .以眼部损害为首发症状的神经梅毒10例临床分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志,2012,26(5):421-422, 435.
[8]
Marra CM. Neurosyphilis[J]. Cont inuum (Minneap Minn),2015,21(6):1714-1728.
[9]
Singh AE. Ocular and neurosyphilis: epidemiology and approach to management[J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis,2020,33(1):66-72.
[10]
佘凡凡, 张学军. 梅毒的眼损害[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(60):24, 45.
[11]
Lapere S, Mustak H, Steffen J. Clinical manifestations and cerebrospinal fluid status in ocular syphilis[J]. Ocul Immunol Inflamm,2019,27(1):126-130.
[12]
商永华, 蒋小玲, 陈仲. 神经电生理在神经梅毒诊治中的新进展[J]. 基层医学论坛,2017,21(4):491-493.
[13]
Moschos MM, Gouliopoulos NS, Kalogeropoulos C. Electrophysiological examination in uveitis: a review of the literature[J]. Clin Ophthalmol,2014,8:199-214.
[14]
You Y, Klistorner A, Thie J, et al. Latency delay of visual evoked potential is a real measurement of demyelination in a rat model of optic neuritis[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2011,52(9):6911-6918.
[15]
李琳, 王佳伟. 梅毒性视神经炎12例临床分析[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志,2016,16(7):416-423.
[16]
戴军, 夏蔚, 吴敏智, 等. 68例眼梅毒患者临床诊断的文献分析及其防治对策[J]. 抗感染药学,2019,16(10):1739-1743.
[17]
Moradi A, Salek S, Daniel E, et al. Clinical features and incidence rates of ocular complications in patients with ocular syphilis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2015,159(2):334-343. e1.
[18]
Klein, A., Fischer N., Goldstein M., et al.The great imitator on the rise: ocular and optic nerve manifestations in patients with newly diagnosed syphilis[J]. Acta Ophthalmol,2019,97(4):e641-e647.
[19]
Prokosch V, Thanos S, Busse H, et al. Ophthalmological symptoms as key findings in neurosyphilis--diagnosis and therapy[J]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd,2009,226(3):184-188.
[20]
寇程, 许东梅, 高俊华, 等. 20例以颅神经受累为主要表现的神经梅毒患者临床分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2019,13(2):172-176.
[21]
樊小娟, 赵杰, 魏世辉. 神经梅毒患者22例神经眼科表现分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2017,17(10):1985-1988.
[22]
Zhu J, Jiang Y, Shi Y, et al. Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of syphilitic uveitis in HIV-negative patients in China: A retrospective case study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(43): e8376.
[23]
商永华, 蒋小玲, 陈仲. 体感诱发电位联合视觉诱发电位在神经梅毒诊断中的应用[J]. 中国医学创新,2016,13(34):125-127.
[24]
Alexander P, Wen Y, Baxter JM, et al. Visual evoked potential (VEP) and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in ocular syphilitic posterior segment inflammation[J]. Doc Ophthalmol,2012,125(2): 169-178.
[25]
Schmidt R, Carson PJ, Jansen RJ. Resurgence of syphilis in the United States: an assessment of contributing factors[J]. Infect Dis (Auckl),2019,12:1178633719883282.
[1] 师璐, 黄宇明, 寇程, 秦开宇, 吴雅丽, 马小扬, 许东梅. 夫妻共同感染梅毒螺旋体临床表型及实验室指标差异[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 328-336.
[2] 许东梅, 马小扬, 黄宇明. 神经梅毒诊疗现状及进展[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 300-306.
[3] 张依, 许东梅. 四例首诊误诊为肿瘤的神经梅毒树胶样肿病例[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 280-286.
[4] 魏春波, 万钢, 许东梅, 赵兴云, 袁柳凤, 吴焱, 伦文辉. 60例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒患者临床和实验室特征[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 254-260.
[5] 吴雅丽, 李晶晶, 许东梅, 黄宇明, 寇程, 崔健. 基于动脉自旋标记技术的麻痹性痴呆患者脑血流量特点及其与认知障碍相关性[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 239-246.
[6] 周莹莹, 邓莉平, 鲁植艳, 苏志颖, 熊勇. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒及巨细胞病毒脑炎一例并相关文献分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 350-355.
[7] 许雪静, 柳月红, 刘彬彬. 神经梅毒合并视神经萎缩患者的眼底特征[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 223-228.
[8] 张宇鹏, 邓爱军, 孙艳. 促红细胞生成素治疗间接性外伤性视神经病变的应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 45-49.
[9] 陈立华, 夏勇, 黄宏志, 魏帆, 孙恺, 陈文锦, 徐如祥. 前床突磨除和视神经管开放对前床突脑膜瘤疗效的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 142-148.
[10] 王航, 蔡亚宁, 衡立君, 葛顺楠, 屈延. 创伤性视神经损伤预后影响因素分析及视神经管骨折手术策略选择[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 23-27.
[11] 陈立华, 夏勇, 魏帆, 孙恺, 黄宏志. 前床突脑膜瘤术后视力的影响因素研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 332-337.
[12] 刘开东, 李劲松, 庄宗, 戴嵬, 杭春华. 前床突脑膜瘤早期硬膜外磨除前床突对视神经的保护作用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 273-276.
[13] 曹晓雯, 裴建. 中西医结合疗法治疗视神经脊髓炎[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 156-157.
[14] 王雪, 赵名娟, 方永莉. 成人复发型急性播散性脑脊髓炎的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 21-25.
[15] 宋蕾, 吴寒, 侯双兴, 楼菁菁, 刘兴党. 关于阿尔茨海默病中视网膜和视神经及相关物质的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 351-355.
阅读次数
全文


摘要