Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04): 392-396. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2017.04.016

• Clinical Research Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Situation of before and after standard antibiotics application in type incision surgery with closed fractures of the extremities

Yiqiang Zhou1, Zhongjian Zheng2, Jianling Xie3, Kai Xu1, Guowen Lin1, Zhibin Chen1, Tao Chen1, Wenlong Chen1, Jianxin Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Orthopaedic Ward 3, Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen 361009, China
    2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen 361009, China
    3. Department of Medical, Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen 361009, China
  • Received:2016-10-27 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2021-09-11
  • Contact: Jianxin Zhang

Abstract:

Objective

To analyse the prevention usage situation of the antibiotic application in fracture surgery before and after applying the "Guideline & Rules of antibiotic clinical application" in our hospital.

Methods

The clinical data of 348 patients who suffered closed fractures of the extremities with type Ⅰ incision in Department of Orthopaedic Ward 3 in our hospital between January 2010 and December 2014 were collected. The course of treatment, expenses, pharmaceutical proportion of antibiotics, postoperative infective rate and the length of stay (LOS) were analyzed, retrospectively.

Results

There was no significant difference in the age, the sex and the disposition of limbs between the patients before the guideline & rules was implemented (GBI group) and after the guideline & rules was implemented (GAI group). The cases who applying unrestricted antibiotics and restricted antibiotics in the GBI were 20 and 151, respectively, while the cases in the GAI were 165 and 12, respectively, with significant differences (χ2 = 232.15, P < 0.001). The course, the expenses and the pharmaceutical proportion of antibiotics in the GBI were (4.006 ± 2.279) days, (839.180 ± 678.177) yuan and (4.674 ± 3.727)%, respectively; while the number in the GAI were (1.492 ± 0.948) days, (58.081 ± 175.449) yuan and (0.239 ± 0.546)%, respectively. There were significant differences in the course, the expenses and the pharmaceutical proportion between patients in GBI group and GAI group (Z =-12.998, -14.746 and -15.270; all P < 0.001). The postoperative infective rate and the average LOA in the GBI were 2.339% and (20.440 ± 16.838) days, respectively; while the number in the GAI were 1.695% and (20.050 ± 13.922) days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative infective rate and the average LOA between patients in GBI group and GAI group (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

After the implementation of the "Guideline & Rules of antibiotic clinical application" , the preventive use of antibiotic of our hospital had become more reasonable. The drug grade and the expenses had been descended while the course had been shorted significantly without increasing the infective rate and the average LOA.

Key words: Antibiotics, Type Ⅰ incision, Closed fractures of the extremities, Infection, Rational drug use

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-85322058 E-mail: editordt@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd