切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 292 -295. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2018.03.018

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

麻痹性痴呆与无症状型神经梅毒患者的脑电信号复杂度分析
姜美娟1, 李务荣1, 伍文清1,(), 黄宇明1, 许东梅1, 王素梅1, 秦开宇1, 马小杨1   
  1. 1. 100015 北京首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2018-06-15
  • 通信作者: 伍文清

Lemple-Zie complexity in patients with general paresis of insane and asymptomatic neurosyphilis

Meijuan Jiang1, Wurong Li1, Wenqing Wu1,(), Yuming Huang1, Dongmei Xu1, Sumei Wang1, Kaiyu Qin1, Xiayang Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 00015, China
  • Received:2017-12-27 Published:2018-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Wenqing Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Wenqing, Email:
引用本文:

姜美娟, 李务荣, 伍文清, 黄宇明, 许东梅, 王素梅, 秦开宇, 马小杨. 麻痹性痴呆与无症状型神经梅毒患者的脑电信号复杂度分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 292-295.

Meijuan Jiang, Wurong Li, Wenqing Wu, Yuming Huang, Dongmei Xu, Sumei Wang, Kaiyu Qin, Xiayang Ma. Lemple-Zie complexity in patients with general paresis of insane and asymptomatic neurosyphilis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 292-295.

目的

采用非线性动力学手段,分析麻痹性痴呆(GPI)和无症状型神经梅毒(AN)患者的脑电信号复杂度(LZC)特点。

方法

选取2015年7月至2017年10月于首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院收治的42例麻痹性痴呆(GPI组)和43例无症状型神经梅毒患者(AN组)安静闭眼状态下的脑电信号(LZ),于Matlab 7.0平台上进行LZC分析,比较两组患者LZC值的变化。

结果

GPI组患者在各导联、左右半球及全脑LZC值均低于AN组,其中双额(F3、F4)、双颞(T5、T6)及右中央(C4)导联LZC值显著降低(F3:0.417 ± 0.116 vs. 0.468 ± 0.128,F4:0.413 ± 0.115 vs. 0.463 ± 0.130,T5:0.398 ± 0.117 vs. 0.457 ± 0.128,T6:0.395 ± 0.115 vs. 0.456 ± 0.128,C4:0.405 ± 0.120 vs. 0.462 ± 0.125),差异均具有统计学意义(t = 2.792、P = 0.043,t = 2.753、P = 0.045,t = 2.711、P = 0.047,t = 2.766、P = 0.044,t = 3.017、P = 0.031)。

结论

LZC值可作为认知功能变化较灵敏的观察指标。随着认知功能的降低,麻痹性痴呆患者额、颞区LZC值可同向下降,可能为麻痹性痴呆的早期诊断及预后评估提供有价值的预测依据。

Objective

To analyze the characteristics of Lemple-Zie complexity (LZC) in patients with general paresis of insane (GPI) and asymptomatic neurosyphilis (AN) using the nonlinear dynamic method.

Methods

Electroencephalogram (EEG) of 42 GPI patients and 43 AN patients with eyes closed in rest state in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University from July 2015 to October 2017 were recorded. The EEG date of each lead was selected for LZC analysis by Matlab 7.0 software, and the changes of LZC values between the two groups were compared.

Results

The LZC values in all leads, bilateral hemispheres and the whole brain in the GPI group were lower than those in AN group, in which the LZC values of bilateral frontal areas (F3, F4), bilateral temporal areas (T5, T6) and the right central area (C4) decreased, with significant differences (F3: 0.417 ± 0.116 vs. 0.468 ± 0.128, t = 2.792, P = 0.043; F4: 0.413 ± 0.115 vs. 0.463 ± 0.130, t = 2.753, P = 0.045; T5: 0.398 ± 0.117 vs. 0.457 ± 0.128, t = 2.711, P = 0.047; T6: 0.395 ± 0.115 vs. 0.456 ± 0.128, t = 2.766, P = 0.044; C4: 0.405 ± 0.120 vs. 0.462 ± 0.125, t = 3.017, P = 0.031).

Conclusions

LZC value could be taken as a more sensitive index of changes of the cognitive function. With the decline of the cognitive function, the LZC values of frontal and temporal areas of the patients with GPI may decrease in the same direction, which may provide a valuable forecasting basis for early diagnosis and prognosis assessment of GPI.

表1 两组患者不同导联区域脑电LZC值( ± s
图1 两组左右半球及全脑的平均脑电LZC值
[1]
Conde-Sendín MA, Hernández-Fleta JL, Cárdenes-Santana MA, et al. Neurosyphilis: forms of presentation and clinical management[J]. Rev Neurol,2002,35(4):380-386.
[2]
樊尚荣, 梁丽芬. 2015年美国疾病控制中心性传播疾病诊断和治疗指南(续)-梅毒的诊断和治疗指南[J]. 中国全科医学,2015,18(27):3260-3264.
[3]
Berger JR, Dean D. Neurosyphilis[J]. Handb Clin Neurol,2014,121:1461-1472.
[4]
Kato H, Ando T. Neurosyphilis and dementia[J]. Brain Nerve,2016,68(4):309-316.
[5]
Willeford WG, Bachmann LH. Syphilis ascendant: a brief history and modern trends[J]. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines,2016,2(20):1-4.
[6]
李颖洁, 邱意弘, 朱贻盛. 脑电信号分析方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2009:3-5.
[7]
闫拓, 薛青, 魏玲, 等. 老年人轻度认知障碍脑电的Lempel-Ziv复杂度分析[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志,2013,30(5):972-975.
[8]
Yang AC, Wang SJ, Lai KL, et al. Cognitive and neuropsychiatric correlates of EEG dynamic complexity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry,2013,47(9):52-61.
[9]
苏宗义, 龚爱红, 隋青, 等. 脑脊液TP-ELISA, TRUST和VDRL检测对神经梅毒的诊断价值探讨[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2014,12(13):1411-1413.
[10]
陈春晓, 蒋荣猛. 神经梅毒临床及实验室检查相关因素的分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2014,8(5):654-657.
[11]
Marra CM. Update on neurosyphilis[J]. Curr Infect Dis Rep,2009,11(2):127-134.
[12]
Marks M, Jarvis JN, Howlett W, et al. Neurosyphilis in Africa: A systematic review[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2017, 11(8):1-14.
[13]
Drago F, Merlo G, Ciccarese G. Changes in neurosyphilis presentation: a survey on 286 patients[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2016,30(11):1886-1900.
[14]
Dores AR, Barbosa F, Carvalho IP, et al. Study of behavioural and neural bases of visuo-spatial working memory with an fMRI paradigm based on an n-back task[J]. J Neuropsychol,2017,11(1):122-134.
[15]
施海姗, 钟笑梅, 侯乐, 等. 麻痹性痴呆与阿尔茨海默病患者海马区氢质子磁共振波谱特点[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2015,48(1):36-39.
[16]
叶林峰, 吴小杨, 林齐防, 等. 麻痹性痴呆患者海马磁共振波谱研究[J]. 临床神经病学杂志,2015,28(6):456-459.
[17]
Wang J, Guo Q, Zhou P, et al. Cognitive impairment in mild general paresis of the insane: AD-like pattern[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2011,31(4):284-290.
[18]
Zong XM, Hou L, Luo XN, et al. Alterations of CSF cystatin C levels and their correlations with CSF Alphabeta40 and Alphabeta 42 levels in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with lewy bodies and the atrophic form of general paresis[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(1):1-7.
[19]
徐梅松, 陶华英. 基于复杂度分析阿尔茨海默病,轻度认知功能障碍患者的脑电特点[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2013,46(10):687-691.
[20]
Nagappa M, Sinha S, Taly ABN, et al. Neurosyphilis: MRI features and their phenotypic correlation in a cohort of 35 patients from a tertiary care university hospital[J]. Neuroradiology,2013,55(4):379- 388.
[21]
高俊华, 李务荣, 伍文清, 等. 46例神经梅毒临床特征及影像学特点[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2016,10(5):570-574.
[22]
Kodarma K, Okada S, Komatsu N, et al. Relationship between MRI findings and prognosis for patients with general paresis[J]. Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci,2000,12(2):246-250.
[23]
吴雅丽, 许东梅, 黄宇明, 等. 以精神症状首发的麻痹性痴呆患者20例临床分析[J]. 大连医科大学学报,2017,39(2):161-164.
[24]
Zhang HL, Lin LR, Liu GL, et al. Clinical spectrum of neurosyphilis among HIV-negative patients in the modern era[J]. Dermatology, 2013,226(2):148-156.
[1] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[2] 师璐, 黄宇明, 寇程, 秦开宇, 吴雅丽, 马小扬, 许东梅. 夫妻共同感染梅毒螺旋体临床表型及实验室指标差异[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 328-336.
[3] 许东梅, 马小扬, 黄宇明. 神经梅毒诊疗现状及进展[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 300-306.
[4] 张依, 许东梅. 四例首诊误诊为肿瘤的神经梅毒树胶样肿病例[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 280-286.
[5] 魏春波, 万钢, 许东梅, 赵兴云, 袁柳凤, 吴焱, 伦文辉. 60例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒患者临床和实验室特征[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 254-260.
[6] 吴雅丽, 李晶晶, 许东梅, 黄宇明, 寇程, 崔健. 基于动脉自旋标记技术的麻痹性痴呆患者脑血流量特点及其与认知障碍相关性[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 239-246.
[7] 冀京雷, 李秀丽, 贾亚男, 冯会敏, 刘丽艳. 改良aEEG评分评估高危足月低体质量新生儿脑损伤的效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 165-169.
[8] 李青华, 靳晨彦, 王艳军, 庄禹童, 何江弘, 郭文治. 七氟醚与丙泊酚对慢性意识障碍患者全身麻醉期间脑电的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 12-18.
[9] 魏微, 何江弘, 黄勇华, 司娟宁. 脑成像技术在意识障碍患者脑功能评估中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 117-120.
[10] 吴新高, 李伟, 马俊, 刘红, 黄平. 癫痫患者定量脑电图功率谱相关参数与认知功能损伤的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 304-308.
[11] 杨新宇, 彭建文, 李辉萍, 陶希, 方翠霓, 宋涛. 脑电非线性分析在卒中后意识障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 185-190.
[12] 梁玉兰, 陈亮, 曾令梅. NLR、RDW水平联合振幅整合脑电图在缺氧缺血性脑病患儿的预后研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 84-89.
[13] 丁浩然, 关宇光, 王雄飞, 赵萌, 王静, 王梦阳, 滕鹏飞, 栾国明. 立体定向脑电图引导下多电极立体适形射频热凝毁损治疗药物难治性岛叶癫痫的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 227-233.
[14] 沈伶俐, 刘晓鸣, 李玮玮, 夏露, 周强. 自身免疫性脑炎患儿视频脑电图监测期间基于共享信息系统的协同干预模式的作用分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 162-166.
[15] 李变, 王莉娜, 桑田, 李珊, 杜雪燕, 李春华, 张兴云, 管巧, 王颖, 冯琪, 蒙景雯. 亚低温技术治疗缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要