切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 230 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2025.04.006

论著

124例慢性难愈创面患者病原菌分布特征和耐药性回顾研究
李娅, 庄淑波()   
  1. 100016 北京,清华大学第一附属医院皮肤美容科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-20 出版日期:2025-08-15
  • 通信作者: 庄淑波

Retrospective study on clinical distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in 124 cases of chronic refractory wounds

Ya Li, Subo Zhuang()   

  1. Department of Cosmetic Dermatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China
  • Received:2025-02-20 Published:2025-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Subo Zhuang
引用本文:

李娅, 庄淑波. 124例慢性难愈创面患者病原菌分布特征和耐药性回顾研究[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 230-241.

Ya Li, Subo Zhuang. Retrospective study on clinical distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in 124 cases of chronic refractory wounds[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 230-241.

目的

回顾性分析慢性难愈创面患者病原菌分布特征和耐药情况,以指导临床制定个性化方案并合理使用抗菌药物。

方法

对2020年1月至2025年1月清华大学第一附属医院皮肤科门诊、皮肤科病房及血管外科病房收治的124例慢性难愈创面患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究。用无菌拭子取患者皮肤溃疡创面分泌物或刮取坏死组织送实验室进行细菌培养。菌种鉴定采用法国生物梅里埃公司VITEK MS检测系统VITEK-2鉴定卡,体外药敏试验采用配套VITEK-2药敏卡及K-B纸片(英国Oxoid公司)扩散法。依据美国临床实验室标准化协会(CLSI)标准进行试验操作及结果判读。应用二元Logistic回归分析创面病原菌培养阳性的独立危险因素。

结果

共分离出病原菌92株,分离率为74.2%,其中革兰阳性球菌主要为金黄色葡萄球菌(27株、29.3%)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(23株、25%);革兰阴性杆菌主要为铜绿假单胞菌(9株、9.8%)、大肠埃希菌(4株、4.3%)和奇异变形杆菌(4株、4.3%)。慢性难愈创面的病因居前3位的分别为下肢动脉血管性溃疡(43例、34.7%)、感染性溃疡(38例、30.6%)和术后伤口愈合不良(15例、12.1%)。感染性溃疡患者金黄色葡萄球菌的检出率显著高于下肢动脉血管病变患者(χ2=6.618、P=0.014)。≥ 60岁患者创面病原菌检出率较< 60岁患者显著增高(χ2=5.236、P=0.022)。Logistic回归分析显示,糖尿病是创面病原菌培养阳性的独立危险因素(OR=2.620、95%CI:1.013~6.777、P=0.047)。糖尿病患者创面病原菌检出率显著高于无糖尿病患者(χ2=7.079、P=0.008),糖尿病患者其他革兰阴性杆菌的阳性检出率显著高于无糖尿病患者(χ2=3.932、P=0.047),糖尿病病程≥15年患者其他革兰阴性杆菌检出率显著高于病程< 15年患者(χ2=5.013、P=0.025),差异均有统计学意义。头颈部金黄色葡萄球菌检出率显著高于躯干部(χ2=8.531、P=0.003)和四肢(χ2=11.738、P=0.001)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(5株、5.4%)和耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(15株、16.3%)均对万古霉素、替加环素和利奈唑胺敏感。9株铜绿假单胞菌(9.8%)对头孢吡肟、美罗培南、阿米卡星、左旋氧氟沙星、环丙沙星和黏菌素均敏感,1株(11.1%)对亚胺培南耐药。4株大肠埃希菌(4.3%)中对阿米卡星、左旋氧氟沙星和磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶各出现1株(25%)耐药。4株奇异变形杆菌(4.3%)中出现3株(75%)对替加环素耐药,各出现2株(50%)对头孢呋肟及磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶耐药。

结论

感染与慢性难愈创面的发生关系密切,糖尿病患者及老年患者是高发人群,创面细菌种类繁多,分布有临床特点,个体化合理选择抗菌药物可以有效控制感染,促进创面愈合,预防和延缓耐药菌的产生和传播。

Objective

To investigate the distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in patients with chronic refractory wounds, and to guide the formulation of personalized antimicrobial treatment plans and promote rational use of antibacterial drug in clinical practice.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 124 patients with chronic refractory wounds admitted to the Dermatology Outpatient Department, Dermatology Inpatient Unit and Vascular Surgery Inpatient Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University from January 2020 to January 2025. Wound secretions or necrotic tissues were collected by sterile swabs and sent to laboratory for bacterial culture. Species identification was performed by VITEK MS microbial identification system (bioMérieux, France) with VITEK-2 identification cards. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing employed matching VITEK-2 susceptibility cards and the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (Oxoid, UK). All experimental procedures and result interpretations were adhered to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The independent risk factors for positive pathogen culture in wound were analyzed by binary Logistic regression.

Results

Total of 92 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated, with the isolation rate of 74.2%; Gram-positive cocci primarily included Staphylococcus aureus (27 strains, 29.3%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (23 strains, 25%); Gram-negative bacilli mainly comprised Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9 strains, 9.8%), Escherichia coli (4 strains, 4.3%) and Proteus mirabilis (4 strains, 4.3%). The top three etiological factors for chronic refractory wounds were lower extremity arterial vascular ulcers (43 cases, 34.7%), infectious ulcers (38 cases, 30.6%) and postoperative poor wound healing (15 cases, 12.1%). The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus was significantly higher in patients with infectious ulcer group compared with patients of lower extremity arterial disease (χ2=6.618, P=0.014). Wound pathogen detection rates were significantly elevated in patients ≥ 60 years old compared with those < 60 years old (χ2=5.236, P=0.022). Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor for positive wound pathogen culture (OR=2.620, 95%CI: 1.013-6.777, P=0.047). The detection rate of wound pathogen was significantly higher in patients with diabetes compared with patients without diabetes (χ2=7.079, P=0.008), the positive detection rate of other Gram-negative bacilli was also significantly higher in patients with diabetic (χ2=3.932, P=0.047). In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus duration ≥ 15 years, detection rates of other Gram-negative bacilli were significantly higher than those with duration < 15 years (χ2=5.013, P=0.025), all with significant differences. The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in head and neck region was significantly higher than that in trunk (χ2=8.531, P=0.003) and limbs (χ2=11.738, P=0.001). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 5 strains (5.4%) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci accounted for 15 strains (16.3%), all were sensitive to vancomycin, tigecycline and linezolid. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9 strains, 9.8%) demonstrated universal susceptibility to cefepime, meropenem, amikacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and colistin, while 1 strain (11.1%) exhibited resistance to imipenem. Among Escherichia coli isolates (4 strains, 4.3%), resistance was observed in 1 strain (25%) to amikacin, levofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, respectively. Proteus mirabilis (4 strains, 4.3%) showed resistance to tigecycline in 3 strains (75%) and 2 strains (50%) to cefuroxime and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, respectively.

Conclusions

Infection is closely associated with the development of chronic refractory wounds, with diabetic and elderly patients being particularly high-risk populations. Wound bacteria exhibit diverse species and characteristic clinical distribution patterns. Rational individualized selection of antimicrobial agents can effectively control infection, promote wound healing, and prevent or delay the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

表1 所分离92株病原菌构成比
表2 124例患者慢性难愈创面病因分布及病原菌检出率
表3 慢性难愈创面三种主要病因所分离病原菌构成比[株(%)]
表4 124例患者慢性难愈创面不同季节所分离病原菌分布[株(%)]
表5 不同性别、年龄和是否合糖尿病患者病原菌分布[株(%)]
表6 慢性难愈创面病原菌检出阳性率影响因素的多因素Logistic二元回归分析
表7 糖尿病患者不同病程病原菌培养阳性率[株(%)]
表8 创面部位分布及病原菌检出率
表9 不同部位病原菌培养阳性率及构成比[株(%)]
表10 55株革兰阳性球菌对抗菌药物的耐药率[株(%)]
抗菌药物 金黄色葡萄球菌 凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌 粪肠球菌(2株) 其他链球菌(3株)
MRSA(5株) MSSA(22株) MRCNS(15株) MSCNS(8株)
青霉素 5(100.0) 19(86.4) 15(100.0) 5(62.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
苯唑西林/MIC 5(100.0) 0(0.0) 15(100.0) 1(12.5) 1(50.0)
头孢洛林 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
庆大霉素 2(40.0) 1(4.5) 1(6.7) 0(0.0) 1(50.0)
红霉素 4(80.0) 10(45.5) 11(73.3) 5(62.5) 1(50.0) 2(66.7)
左旋氧氟沙星 2(40.0) 3(13.6) 8(53.3) 1(12.5) 1(50.0) 1(33.3)
莫西沙星 2(40.0) 3(13.6) 3(20.0) 1(12.5) 1(33.3)
万古霉素 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
替考拉宁 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(13.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
达托霉素 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(6.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
替加环素 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
克林霉素 4(80.0) 11(50.0) 10(66.7) 2(25.0) 1(33.3)
利奈唑胺 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶 2(40.0) 4(18.2) 2(13.4) 1(0.0)
利福平 1(20.0) 1(4.5) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
氨苄西林 1(50.0) 0(0.0)
头孢曲松 1(33.3)
头孢吡肟 1(33.3)
头孢唑林 0(0.0)
氯霉素 0(0.0)
表11 21株革兰阴性杆菌对抗菌药物的耐药率[株(%)]
[1]
熊元,米博斌,闫晨晨, 等. 创伤骨科慢性难愈性创面诊疗指南(2023版)[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2023,39(6):481-493.
[2]
Zafer MM, Mohamed GA, Ibrahim SRM, et al. Biofilm-mediated infections by multidrug-resistant microbes: a comprehensive exploration and forward perspectives[J]. Arch Microbiol,2024,206(3):101.
[3]
尚红,王毓三,申子瑜主编. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2019,1358-1747.
[4]
唐玉莹,向丽萍. 慢性感染性难愈合创面感染病原菌分布特征及耐药性分析[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志,2024,36(2):95-100.
[5]
霍继武,李光早,李璐, 等. 慢性难愈性创面分泌物细菌培养及药敏试验结果的数据分析[J/CD]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2020, 7(88):144-145.
[6]
祁万乐,卓么加,田琰, 等. 高原地区老年慢性难愈合创面患者流行病学调查分析[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2021,16(1):44-49.
[7]
陈秀芳,何仁亮,朱定衡, 等. 65例慢性皮肤溃疡患者临床特征分析[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志,2024,36(3):179-182.
[8]
Modak S, Mane P, Patil S. A comprehensive phenotypic characterization of biofilm-producing coagulase-negative Staphylococci: elucidating the complexities of antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility[J]. Cureus,2025,17(2):e79039.
[9]
汪宗林,陈建荣,尤忠毓, 等. 金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜形成与耐药机制的研究进展[J]. 生物工程学报,2024,40(7):2038-2051.
[10]
Wolny D, Štěpánek L, Horáková D, et al. Risk factors for non-healing wounds-a single-centre study[J]. J Clin Med,2024,13(4):1003.
[11]
薛芬,许可欣,骆晓凤, 等. 4例感染纹带棒状杆菌的病例报道[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2023,44(11):1403-1406.
[12]
Wang G, Lin Z, Li Y, et al, Garza LA. Colonizing microbiota is associated with clinical outcomes in diabetic wound healing[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev,2023,194:114727.
[13]
许亚丽,张杜超,张捷, 等. 5例放线菌病临床特征[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2024,34(5):673-677.
[14]
蔡钦云,孔亮,严雪冰. 糖尿病足感染发病机制及抗感染治疗研究进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2025,20(3):405-407.
[15]
张朝霞,吴卫志,王广进, 等. 571例皮肤软组织感染住院患者病原菌分布和耐药性分析[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2022,38(11):775-779.
[16]
张杉杉,赵连礼,何泱, 等. 常见不同细菌感染对糖尿病足溃疡患者病情和短期预后的影响[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志,2017,33(1):11-16.
[17]
王雪欣,余鹏,张明谏, 等. 糖尿病足患者下肢动脉病变和伤口细菌学分析[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(6):386-388.
[18]
刘可,张成敏,柯为, 等. 引起压疮感染的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜形成情况及耐药性分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2024,45(10):1171-1174, 1179.
[19]
祁少海,刘坡,利天增, 等. 老年人慢性难愈合创面临床特点分析[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(12):897-990.
[20]
Lancerotto L, Lago G, Pescarini E, et al. Therapeutic effects of pregnancy on a chronic skin ulcer[J]. Eplasty,2013,13:e29.
[21]
Lee HJ, Kim M. Skin barrier function and the microbiome[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2022,23(21):13071.
[22]
陈兴阳,陈雷,吉希杰. 感染性慢性难愈合创面病原菌分布特点及耐药性分析[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志,2021,33(2):86-90.
[23]
Bilyk BL, Panchal VV, Tinajero-Trejo M, et al. An interplay of multiple positive and negative factors governs methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev,2022,86(2):e0015921.
[24]
Pimenta LKL, Rodrigues CA, Filho ARG, et al. Staphylococcus spp. causatives of infections and carrier of blaZ, femA, and mecA Genes associated with resistance[J]. Antibiotics (Basel), 2023,12(4):671.
[25]
胡红兵,夏维,康世秀, 等. 耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌新生儿败血症分离株的耐药基因研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2007,17(8):920-922.
[26]
郭燕,胡付品,朱德妹, 等. 2023年CHINET中国细菌耐药监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志,2024,24(6):627-637.
[27]
Li C, Chen R, Qiao J, et al. Distribution and molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in Henan, China[J]. Sci Rep,2024,14(1):14418.
[28]
Paudel R, Shrestha E, Chapagain B, et al. Carbapenemase producing Gram negative bacteria: Review of resistance and detection methods[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2024,110(1):116370.
[29]
Tenover FC, Nicolau DP, Gill CM. Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa--an emerging challenge[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect,2022,11(1):811-814.
[30]
闫小利,谢晗雨,宋瑞雅, 等. 铜绿假单胞菌耐药特点及产碳青霉烯酶菌株基因检测[J]. 检验医学与临床,2025,22(3):390-394.
[31]
苏爱美,韦涌涛,王东平. 耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌耐药性及联合药敏试验研究[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023,17(5):333-340.
[32]
Leal SM Jr, Jones M, Gilligan PH. Clinical significance of commensal Gram-positive rods routinely isolated from patient samples[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2016,54(12):2928-2936.
[1] 程碧辉, 勾竹, 周茜, 杨晓敏, 李容. 抗精神疾病药物孕期治疗对严重精神障碍孕妇妊娠结局的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 304-312.
[2] 奎玉凤, 李毅. 糖尿病血管内皮细胞损伤机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(04): 363-367.
[3] 杨纯旭, 张玥, 匡英杰, 刘明. 创面微环境温度对慢性创面愈合影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 260-264.
[4] 张丽花, 胡耀华, 周春献, 张晓亭, 胡韶军. 恶性肿瘤患者住院化疗期间医院感染状况及列线图预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 205-213.
[5] 杨帆. 降钙素原水平对细菌性支气管炎病原菌类型鉴别及对莫西沙星用药的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 116-123.
[6] 陈斌雄, 谢铭. 袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术对肥胖合并T2DM的治疗效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 461-466.
[7] 梁瑶瑶, 邬绿莹, 陈津. 负载干细胞外泌体水凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 112-119.
[8] 夏长河, 胡旭华, 郑晓红, 刘芳, 王亚轩, 王贵英. 直肠癌腹会阴联合切除(Miles)术后迟发性尿道瘘一例[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 281-283.
[9] 王柯云, 孙雅佳, 李甜, 张钰哲, 郑颖, 张伟光, 王倩, 董哲毅. 糖尿病肾脏疾病早期发生风险预测模型的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 218-225.
[10] 李洪黎, 张妍春. 神经营养因子对糖尿病视网膜病变神经血管单元损伤保护的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 176-182.
[11] 张帆, 王海波, 袁琳慧, 靳蕾, 刘新. 糖尿病性黄斑水肿发病机制与治疗研究的新进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 188-192.
[12] 王晓宇, 段虹宇, 陈嘉玮, 秦锐, 齐虹. 0.05%环孢素A滴眼液治疗糖尿病相关干眼的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 149-154.
[13] 李思彤, 高振轩, 刘佳鑫, 张泽, 金泉宇, 施歌, 阿尔曼·阿卜杜热扎克, 寇蕾, 张黎. 丹参酮ⅡA抑制焦亡通路改善糖尿病周围神经病变的分子机制研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(03): 134-147.
[14] 唐梦楚, 段俗言, 王宁宁, 毛慧娟, 刘云. 胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂应用于糖尿病肾脏疾病的进展更新[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 307-314.
[15] 秦楠, 汪川, 穆尼热·穆合塔尔, 蒋升. 2 型糖尿病患者维生素D 与胰岛功能的相关性[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 199-205.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?