切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 278 -284. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2024.05.004

论著

获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关淋巴瘤患者的临床特征及生存状况的变化趋势
丁科1, 张亚琼1, 刘杰1, 邓莉平1, 张永喜1, 熊勇1,()   
  1. 1.430071 武汉市,武汉大学中南医院感染科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-07 出版日期:2024-10-15
  • 通信作者: 熊勇
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项(No. 2017ZX10202101-001)2020年湖北省重点研发计划项目(No.2020BCB025)武汉大学中南医院学科培育项目(No. ZNXKPY2021021)

Clinical characteristics and trends in survival status of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma

Ke Ding1, Yaqiong Zhang1, Jie Liu1, Liping Deng1, Yongxi Zhang1, Yong Xiong1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2024-06-07 Published:2024-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Yong Xiong
引用本文:

丁科, 张亚琼, 刘杰, 邓莉平, 张永喜, 熊勇. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关淋巴瘤患者的临床特征及生存状况的变化趋势[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 278-284.

Ke Ding, Yaqiong Zhang, Jie Liu, Liping Deng, Yongxi Zhang, Yong Xiong. Clinical characteristics and trends in survival status of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 278-284.

目的

探讨获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关淋巴瘤(ARL)的临床特征及预后的变化趋势。

方法

以2006年1月至2015年12月于武汉大学中南医院诊治的53例ARL患者为对照组,2016年开始本院ARL患者抗肿瘤方案有所改进,故以2016年1月至2022年12月于本院诊治的97例ARL患者为研究组;采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher's确切概率法比较两组患者的临床特征[非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)病理分型、Ann Arbor分期、中枢侵犯和骨髓侵犯等]及生存状态。

结果

与对照组相比,研究组患者确诊ARL时平均年龄大[(48.81 ± 12.50)岁 vs. (43.13 ± 12.75)岁:t = 2.65、P = 0.010],临床分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期者占比高(81.44% vs. 54.72%:χ2 = 13.722、P < 0.001),国际预后指数(IPI)评分差(3~5分比例:84.53% vs. 66.04%:χ2 = 7.495、P = 0.024),骨髓受侵犯者占比高(46.39% vs. 28.30%:χ2 = 4.673、P = 0.031),淋巴瘤病理分型变化显著(P = 0.003)[伯基特淋巴瘤(BL)患者占比显著升高(37.11% vs. 9.43%),弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤占比降低(44.33% vs. 67.92%)];而两组患者的性别、CD4+ T细胞计数、是否中枢侵犯、是否接受ARL治疗和高效抗反转录病毒治疗(HAART)等差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。随访期间共93例(研究组55例,对照组38例)ARL患者死亡,随访时间为11.21(4.00,29.25)个月。研究组和对照组患者随访时间分别为10.0(4.50,24.50)个月和7.0(2.0,112.0)个月(Z = 0.11、P = 0.910),1年总生存(OS)率分别为54.64%和41.51%(χ2 = 2.363、P = 0.124),其中接受抗肿瘤治疗患者的1年OS率分别为69.33%和60.0%(χ2 = 0.931、P = 0.335),未接受肿瘤治疗患者的1年OS率分别为4.55%和5.56%(P > 0.999),差异均无统计学意义。肿瘤进展是导致研究组和对照组患者死亡主要原因,分别高达81.82%(45/55)和81.58%(31/38)。

结论

近年ARL患者发病年龄推迟,BL占比较前明显增多,ARL临床分期分级更差,探索更为有效的治疗方法更加迫切。

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and prognostic trends of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma (ARL).

Methods

Total of 53 patients with ARL diagnosed and treated in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2006 to December 2015 were selected as control group, due to the improvement of the anti-tumor regimen for ARL patients since 2016,97 patients with ARL diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2022 were selected as research group. Pearson Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability method were used to compare the clinical characteristics, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) pathological classification, Ann Arbor stage, central involvement and bone marrow involvement, etc, and survival status between the two groups.

Results

Compared with control group, patients in research group were older [(48.81 ± 12.50) years old vs. (43.13 ±12.75) years old:t = 2.65, P = 0.010], and the proportion of patients with clinical stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ was higher (81.44%vs. 54.72%:χ2 = 13.722, P < 0.001), international prognostic index (IPI) score was poorer (proportion of 3-5 points:84.53% vs. 66.04%:χ2 = 7.495, P = 0.024), proportion of bone marrow involvement was higher (46.39%vs. 28.30%:χ2 = 4.673, P = 0.031) and the pathological classification of lymphoma changed significantly (P = 0.003)[the proportion of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) patients increased significantly (37.11% vs. 9.43%), the proportion of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma decreased (44.33% vs. 67.92%)]; There were no significant differences in gender, CD4+ T cell count, central nervous system involvement, ARL treatment and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Total of 93 ARL patients (55 cases in research group and 38 cases in control group) died during the follow-up period, and the follow-up time was 11.21(4.00, 29.25) months. The follow-up time of research group and control group were 10.0 (4.50, 24.50) months and 7.0 (2.0, 112.0) months, respectively (Z = 0.11, P = 0.910). The one-year overall survival (OS) rates of research group and control group were 54.64% and 41.51%, respectively (χ2 = 2.363, P = 0.124). The oneyear OS rates of patients who received oncotherapy were 69.33% and 60.0% (χ2 = 0.931, P = 0.335), and the one-year OS rates of patients who did not receive oncotherapy were 4.55% and 5.56% (P > 0.999), all without significant differences. Tumor progression was the main cause of death in research group and control group,up to 81.82% (45/55) and 81.58% (31/38), respectively.

Conclusions

In recent years, the onset age of ARL patients is delayed, the proportion of BL is significantly increased, the clinical stage of ARL is worse, and it is more urgent to explore more effective treatment methods.

表1 研究组和对照组患者的临床特征
表2 研究组和对照组ARL 患者的预后 [例(%)]
[1]
Rubinstein PG, Aboulafia DM, Zloza A. Malignancies in HIV/AIDS:from epidemiology to therapeutic challenges[J]. AIDS,2014,28(4):453-465.
[2]
Riedel DJ, Rositch AF, Redfield RR, et al. HIV-associated lymphoma sub-type distribution, immunophenotypes and survival in an urban clinic population[J]. Leuk Lymphoma,2016,57(2):306-312.
[3]
Berhan A, Bayleyegn B, Getaneh Z. HIV/AIDS associated lymphoma:review[J]. Blood Lymphat Cancer,2022,12:31-45.
[4]
Re A, Cattaneo C, Rossi G. HIV and lymphoma:from epidemiology to clinical management[J]. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis,2019,11(1):e2019004.
[5]
何孜岩, 俞文娟, 索珊珊, 等. R-CHOP方案和R-DA-EPOCH方案一线治疗non-GCB型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤回顾性研究[J]. 中华血液学杂志,2022,43(4):346-348.
[6]
Sehn LH, Salles G. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med,2021,384(9):842-858.
[7]
王迪, 冯艳玲. HIV/AIDS相关淋巴瘤研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志,2015,42(6):475-477.
[8]
孙开宇, 桂希恩, 邓涤, 等. 53例艾滋病相关非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华血液学杂志,2017,38(2):97-101.
[9]
中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华内科杂志,2021,60(12):1106-1128.
[10]
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms[J].Blood,2016,127(20):2375-2390.
[11]
Ruffieux Y, Muchengeti M, Olago V, et al. Age and cancer incidence in 5.2 million people with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV):The South African HIV cancer match study[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2023,76(8):1440-1448.
[12]
Pongas GN, Ramos JC. HIV-associated lymphomas:progress and new challenges[J]. J Clin Med,2022,11(5):1447.
[13]
莫平征, 熊勇, 高世成, 等. 联合抗反转录病毒治疗对艾滋病合并恶性肿瘤的影响[J]. 中华传染病杂志,2021,39(1):15-20.
[14]
Sullivan PS, Satcher Johnson A, Pembleton ES, et al. Epidemiology of HIV in the USA:epidemic burden, inequities, contexts, and responses[J]. Lancet,2021,397(10279):1095-1106.
[15]
孙顺容, 吴敏, 乌丽盼·甫拉提, 等. 89例非霍奇金淋巴瘤相关噬血细胞综合征临床特点和疗效分析[J]. 中华血液学杂志,2021,42(4):324-331.
[16]
惠疆锦, 万智凯, 郎观晶, 等. 艾滋病相关淋巴瘤84例临床特征和预后分析[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志,2022,15(6):448-453.
[17]
Gopal S, Patel MR, Yanik EL, et al. Temporal trends in presentation and survival for HIV-associated lymphoma in the antiretroviral therapy era[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2013,105(16):1221-1229.
[18]
Ramaswami R, Chia G, Dalla Pria A, et al. Evolution of HIVAssociated Lymphoma Over 3 Decades[J]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr,2016,72(2):177-183.
[19]
Wang Z, Zhang R, Liu L, et al. Incidence and spectrum of infections among HIV/AIDS patients with lymphoma during chemotherapy[J]. J Infect Chemother,2021,27(10):1459-1464.
[20]
Noy A. Optimizing treatment of HIV-associated lymphoma[J].Blood,2019,134(17):1385-1394.
[21]
Noy A. HIV lymphoma and Burkitts lymphoma[J]. Cancer J,2020,26(3):260-268.
[22]
Carbone A, Vaccher E, Gloghini A. Hematologic cancers in individuals infected by HIV[J]. Blood,2022,139(7):995-1012.
[23]
Crombie J, LaCasce A. The treatment of Burkitt lymphoma in adults[J]. Blood,2021,137(6):743-750.
[24]
Evens AM, Danilov A, Jagadeesh D, et al. Burkitt lymphoma in the modern era:real-world outcomes and prognostication across 30 US cancer centers[J]. Blood,2021,137(3):374-386.
[25]
崔贵香, 丁晓燕, 褚盈晖, 等. 57例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染合并Burkkit淋巴瘤患者的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2023,17(2):102-109.
[26]
McMillan AK, Phillips EH, Kirkwood AA, et al. Favourable outcomes for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (IPI 3-5) treated with front-line R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC chemotherapy:results of a phase 2 UK NCRI trial[J]. Ann Oncol,2020,31(9):1251-1259.
[1] 张焱, 刘春媚, 姚瑾, 陈苗苗, 徐雯, 黄品同. 超声O-RADS分类和临床特征对不同病理类型卵巢浆液性肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 268-274.
[2] 顾盼盼, 董传莉, 宋梦瑶, 瞿色华, 杨小迪, 周瑞. 不完全性川崎病患儿临床特征及冠状动脉损害情况分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 446-451.
[3] 吴令杰, 陈瑞烈, 肖湘明, 郭耿龙, 林钟滨, 张海生, 周敏, 陈妙华. 2005至2021年广东省汕头市某综合医院人类免疫缺陷病毒感染/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者流行病学特征及高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后生存状况影响因素[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 207-214.
[4] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[5] 高佳, 姜吉询, 王鑫, 吴婷, 向江明. 病理性乳头溢液单中心临床分析附168例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 323-326.
[6] 颜晓敏, 崔嵘嵘. 23例乳腺佩吉特病的经验交流[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 353-354.
[7] 张礼江, 沈玲佳, 施我大. 倾向性评分匹配分析奥希替尼对晚期NSCLC 预后的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 820-822.
[8] 杨柳, 陈佳, 孙雅娟, 陈娇, 谭明超, 龚明福. 抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎的胸部CT 及临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 744-749.
[9] 杨攀, 黄晓寒, 邓才霞, 周利航, 周向东, 罗虎. SMARCA4缺失的胸部未分化肿瘤临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 529-534.
[10] 何俊, 易淑华, 陈婷婷, 杨玉, 李红雨, 谢飞, 何健. 妊娠并发社区获得性肺炎临床特征及降钙素原和炎症指数对其诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 421-425.
[11] 李苑莹, 龚金如, 陈晓璇, 孙瑞琳. 成人肺炎支原体肺炎临床特征分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 223-228.
[12] 张金珠, 梅世文, 孙金峰, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 李国利, 汪欣, 王锡山, 汤坚强. 原发结直肠癌超系膜切除术后患者的生存危险因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 197-204.
[13] 李广林, 唐凯, 卢秀珍. 部分调节性内斜视的临床研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 177-181.
[14] 刘昌恩, 李岩, 张其德. 基于内镜筛查发现的自身免疫性胃炎的临床特征分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 233-237.
[15] 王宇, 张泽锴, 吴明胜, 王高祥, 孙效辉, 王君, 徐美青, 李田, 徐世斌, 解明然. 术后病理诊断为良性肺结节323例患者临床特征分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 167-174.
阅读次数
全文


摘要