切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 92 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2021.02.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

两种三联高效抗逆转录病毒治疗方案在妊娠合并人类免疫缺陷病毒感染治疗中的应用价值
吴彩花1,(), 姜树勤1, 张丽1, 姜树萍2, 肖献花3   
  1. 1. 056002 邯郸市,河北省邯郸市传染病医院感染产科
    2. 056002 邯郸市,河北省邯郸市第四医院妇科
    3. 056002 邯郸市,河北省邯郸市第二医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-04 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 吴彩花
  • 基金资助:
    2018年度河北省医学科学研究重点课题(No. 20181699)

Application value of two triple highly active antiretroviral therapy in treatment of pregnant women complicated with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Caihua Wu1,(), Shuqin Jiang1, Li Zhang1, Shuping Jiang2, Xianhua Xiao3   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics of Infection, Infectious Diseases Hospital, Handan 056002, China
    2. Department of Gynecology, the Fourth Hospital, Handan 056002, China
    3. Department of Gynecology, Second Hospital, Handan 056002, China
  • Received:2020-05-04 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Caihua Wu
引用本文:

吴彩花, 姜树勤, 张丽, 姜树萍, 肖献花. 两种三联高效抗逆转录病毒治疗方案在妊娠合并人类免疫缺陷病毒感染治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 92-98.

Caihua Wu, Shuqin Jiang, Li Zhang, Shuping Jiang, Xianhua Xiao. Application value of two triple highly active antiretroviral therapy in treatment of pregnant women complicated with human immunodeficiency virus infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 92-98.

目的

比较含齐多夫定(AZT)和不含AZT的两种三联高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)方案在妊娠合并人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染治疗中的应用价值。

方法

选择邯郸市传染病医院2014年1月至2018年12月收治的40例妊娠合并HIV感染孕妇为研究对象,使用简单随机数字表法将其分成观察组(20例)和对照组(20例)。其中观察组患者采用含AZT的三联HAART方案治疗,即AZT + 3TC(拉米夫定)+ LPV/r(洛匹那韦利托那韦)/EFV(依非韦伦)/NVP(奈韦拉平),对照组患者采取不含AZT的三联HAART方案治疗,即TDF(替诺福韦酯)+ 3TC + LPV/r/EFV/NVP。入组对象均于妊娠14周时开始用药,服药至产后第6周末。分别于用药前和产前1周时检测两组孕妇血浆HIV-1型核糖核酸(HIV-1 RNA)载量和外周血T淋巴细胞计数。采用Yates校正卡方检验比较两组孕妇妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症(ICP)、羊水污染、产后出血、产褥感染及新生儿低出生体重(LBW)发生率;采用Pearson卡方检验分别比较两组孕妇剖宫产率,孕妇及两组新生儿不同程度贫血的发生率;采用t检验比较两组新生儿出生体重和1 min Apgar评分等;采用Fisher确切概率法分析新生儿窒息率以及随访6个月后两组新生儿HIV感染率。

结果

观察组与对照组孕妇产前1周时血浆HIV-1 RNA载量均较本组用药前显著降低(观察组:t = 29.358、P < 0.001,对照组:t = 24.858、P < 0.001),且以产前1周观察组孕妇HIV-1 RNA载量显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t = 7.203、P < 0.001)。观察组与对照组孕妇产前1周时外周血CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数和CD4+/CD8+ T均较本组用药前显著上升(P均< 0.05),而CD8+ T淋巴细胞计数均较用药前显著降低(观察组:t = 3.754、P = 0.001,对照组:t = 2.235、P = 0.031);且产前1周时观察组孕妇外周血CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数和CD4+/CD8+ T均显著高于对照组(CD4+ T:t = 2.199、P = 0.034;CD4+/CD8+ T:t = 2.168、P = 0.037),CD8+ T淋巴细胞计数则显著低于对照组(t = 2.046、P = 0.048),差异均有统计学意义。观察组与对照组孕妇ICP、羊水污染、产后出血、产褥感染和剖宫产发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。观察组与对照组新生儿出生体重、LBW发生率、1 min Apgar评分和窒息率差异亦均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05)。观察组新生儿贫血率为60.00%(12/20),显著高于对照组新生儿[25.00%(5/20)],差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 5.013、P = 0.025)。观察组新生儿随访期间未发生HIV母婴传播,对照组中1例新生儿在出生后第5周时HIV核酸检测阳性,母婴传播率为5.00%,观察组与对照组差异无统计学意义(P = 1.000)。

结论

与不含AZT的三联HAART方案(TDF + 3TC + LPV/r/EFV/NVP)相比,妊娠合并HIV感染孕妇应用含AZT的三联HAART方案(AZT + 3TC + LPV/r/EFV/NVP)治疗能更有效地促进孕妇机体免疫功能的恢复,降低HIV RNA载量水平,但含AZT的三联HAART方案治疗的新生儿贫血率较高。

Objective

To compare the application value of two kinds of triple highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with and without zidovudine (AZT) in the treatment of pregnant women complicated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

Methods

Total of 40 pregnant women with HIV infection who were admitted to Handan Infectious Diseases Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were selected, and were divided into two groups randomly by random number table method: observation group (20 cases) and control group (20 cases). The cases in observation group were treated with triple HAART containing AZT, which contained AZT + 3TC (lamivudine) + LPV/R (lopinavir ritonavir)/EFV (efavirenz)/NVP (nevirapine). The cases in control group were treated with triple HAART without AZT, which contained TDF (tenofovir disoproxil) + 3TC + LPV/R/EFV/NVP. All the patients began to take the medicine at the 14th week of pregnancy, and took medicine till the 6th week of postpartum. The load of plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (HIV-1 RNA) and peripheral blood T-lymphocyte counts were tested before medication and one week before delivery separately. The incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), amniotic fluid contamination, postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal infection of pregnant women and low birth weight (LBW) between the two groups were analyzed by Yates calibration square test. The cesarean section rates and incidence of different degrees anaemia of pregnant women and newborns of the two groups were compared by Pearson chi-square test, respectively. The birth weight and 1 min Apgar score etc. of the two groups of newborns were analyzed by t test. The incidence of neonatal asphyxia and HIV infection in the two groups of newborns after 6 months of follow-up were analyzed by Fisher exact probability method.

Results

The levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA load of cases in observation group and control group at the first week before delivery were significantly lower than those before treatment (observation group: t = 29.358, P < 0.001, control group: t = 24.858, P < 0.001), and HIV-1 RNA load of pregnant women in observation group one week before delivery was significantly lower than that of the control group, with significant difference (t = 7.203, P < 0.001). The peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocyte counts and CD4+/CD8+ T of pregnant women one week before delivery in the two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (all P < 0.05), while CD8+ T lymphocyte counts were significantly lower than those before treatment (observation group: t = 3.754, P = 0.001, control group: t = 2.235, P = 0.031). The peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocyte count and CD4+/CD8+ T of pregnant women one week before delivery in observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (CD4+ T: t = 2.199, P = 0.034; CD4+/CD8+ T: t = 2.168, P = 0.037), while the CD8+ T lymphocyte count was significantly lower than that of the control group (t = 2.046, P = 0.048), with significant differences. There was no significant difference in incidence of ICP, amniotic fluid pollution, postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal infection and cesarean section between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in newborns birth weight, LBW incidence, 1 min Apgar score and asphyxia rate between newborns of the two groups (all P > 0.05). The neonatal anaemia rate in the observation group was 60.00% (12/20), which was significantly higher than that in the control group [25.00% (5/20)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 5.013, P = 0.025). During the follow-up period of newborns, there was no mother-to-child transmission of HIV in observation group, while in control group, there was one newborn with positive HIV nucleic acid test at the 5th week after birth. The mother-to-child transmission rate was 5.00%, without significant difference between the two groups (P = 1.000).

Conclusions

Compared with the triple HAART without AZT (TDF + 3TC + LPV/R/EFV/NVP), the triple HAART with AZT (AZT + 3TC + LPV/R/EFV/NVP) could effectively promote the recovery of immune function of pregnant women and reduce the level of HIV viral load, but the triple HAART with AZT had a higher rate of neonatal anemia.

表1 观察组和对照组HIV感染孕妇的一般资料
表2 观察组和对照组孕妇用药前和产前1周时HIV-1 RNA载量及T淋巴细胞计数( ± s
表3 观察组和对照组孕妇的母婴结局
表4 观察组和对照组孕妇和新生儿贫血程度和发生率[例(%)]
表5 观察组和对照组HIV母婴传播发生率[例(%)]
[1]
赵丽娜, 王大勇, 叶振淼, 等. 2013-2017年温州市报告15岁以上女性HIV/AIDS病例流行病学特征分析[J]. 实用预防医学,2019,26(5):613-615.
[2]
汤柳英, 张畅斌, 高爽, 等. 广东省2014-2017年HIV感染孕产妇及暴露婴儿流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2019,40(11):1392-1397.
[3]
付小凤, 汤杰, 周芸, 等. 感染艾滋病育龄妇女流行病学概况[J]. 医学动物防制,2019,35(3):255-258.
[4]
杨蓉蓉, 桂希恩, 熊勇, 等. 经联合抗反转录病毒治疗的因献血感染人类免疫缺陷病毒者肝病相关死亡分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2019,13(5):377-381..
[5]
中国疾病预防控制中心, 性病艾滋病预防控制中心,性病控制中心. 2017年12月全国艾滋病性病疫情[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2018,24(2):111.
[6]
吴国敏, 桂希恩, 李家兵, 等. 2004-2016年湖北省520例HIV阳性孕妇流行病学特征及终止妊娠情况分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2019,34(2):405-410.
[7]
周信娟, 沈智勇, 阮玉华, 等. 经母婴传播艾滋病患者生存分析[J]. 流行病学研究,2018,34(7):964-967.
[8]
唐琪, 齐唐凯, 卢洪洲, 等. 抗逆转录病毒药物治疗HIV感染新进展[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志,2018,45(3):200-203.
[9]
李燕. 艾滋病母婴传播预防进展[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2012,33(11):1-3.
[10]
Ramírez-Ramírez A, Sánchez-Serrano E, Loaiza-Flores G, et al. Simultaneous quantification of four antiretroviral drugs in breast milk samples from HIV-positive women by an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(1):e0191236.
[11]
陈悦, 邝晓聪, 李慕军, 等. 妊娠期齐多夫定干预对新生儿,新生鼠造血干/祖细胞活性的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报,2018,35(3):306-310.
[12]
van Lettow M, Landes M, van Oosterhout JJ, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a cross-sectional study in Malawi[J]. B World Health Organ,2018,96(4):256-265.
[13]
张秋月, 张彤. 艾滋病抗病毒治疗现状及其研究进展[J]. 中国病毒病杂志,2018,8(2):103-108.
[14]
何艳, 罗艳丁, 依玲郑, 等. 高效抗逆转录病毒治疗阻断母婴HIV传播及对婴儿生长发育的影响[J]. 中华预防医学杂志,2011,45(10):912-915.
[15]
陈巧佩, 张园园, 王前, 等. HIV阳性孕产妇HARRT治疗后的病毒载量变化及母婴阻断效果分析[J]. 国际病毒学杂志,2018,25(4):271-274.
[16]
何惠达, 李玉枝, 何瑞英, 等. 高效抗逆转录病毒治疗对HIV感染者外周血病毒储存库的影响[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志,2018,45(1):4-8.
[17]
Low YS, Islahudin F, Razali KAM, et al. Modification of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in paediatric HIV patients[J]. Open AIDS J,2018,12:11-19.
[18]
Autran B, Carcelain G, Li TS, et al. Positive effects of combined antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cell homeostasis and function in advanced HIV disease[J]. Science,1997,277(5322):112-116.
[19]
李静, 周明菊, 张和倩, 等. CD4+细胞毒性T细胞在临床HIV感染中的研究进展[J]. 传染病信息,2018,31(6):516-540.
[20]
荆凡辉, 吕玮, 李太生. HIV感染者免疫功能重建新视角: CD4/CD8比值[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2018,24(6):643-646.
[21]
杨科, 杨再东. HIV/AIDS病人CD4+ T淋巴细胞检测结果分析[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2019,25(11):1170-1171.
[22]
汪玲琴, 蒋忠胜, 蒙达礼, 等. 柳州市接受HAART艾滋病患者随访8年的生存分析[J]. 疾病预防控制,2019,46(11):2053-2057.
[23]
徐鹏飞, 邓慧玲, 王小燕, 等. 六例慢性乙型肝炎儿童患者抗病毒治疗短期疗效[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2020,14(6):518-522.
[24]
Nash D, Robertson M. How to evolve the response to the global HIV epidemic with new metrics and targets based on pre-treatment CD4 counts[J]. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep,2019,16(4):304-313.
[25]
董昱, 桂希恩, 陈静, 等. 2004-2017年湖北省部分地区HIV阳性孕妇抗病毒治疗及母婴传播率分析[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2019,25(5):445-450.
[26]
王丽, 解洪明, 金春英, 等. 含齐多夫定或替诺福韦的两组治疗方案的早期疗效评价[J]. 国际免疫学杂志,2018,41(2):154-157.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] 张玉, 薛文瑞, 王鑫, 李旭瑜, 王旭东, 袁鹏飞, 梁雨润, 韩志兴, 张海建, 刘庆军, 纪世琪. 人类免疫缺陷病毒感染合并膀胱癌14例临床特点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 354-358.
[10] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[11] 王跃, 唐敏, 李鹏超, 吕强. 妊娠期膀胱副神经节瘤伴严重出血一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-411.
[12] 杨聚荣. 透析患者妊娠的管理[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 300-300.
[13] 王希岗, 张波, 李鸣, 高敏, 薛建新. 神经外科手术部位感染在HIV感染者与非HIV感染者中的临床差异[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 228-233.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
阅读次数
全文


摘要