切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 526 -532. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2018.06.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关淋巴瘤的影像与病理对照研究
陈七一1, 徐云良1, 吕志彬1, 谢汝明1,(), 赵红心2, 陈步东1   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-27 出版日期:2018-12-15
  • 通信作者: 谢汝明
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院青年人才发展基金"萌芽"支持计划项目(No. DTMY201605)

Comparative study of imaging and pathology of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related lymphoma

Qiyi Chen1, Yunliang Xu1, Zhibin Lv1, Ruming Xie1,(), Hongxin Zhao2, Budong Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
    2. Department of Infection, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2018-09-27 Published:2018-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Ruming Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Ruming, Email:
引用本文:

陈七一, 徐云良, 吕志彬, 谢汝明, 赵红心, 陈步东. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关淋巴瘤的影像与病理对照研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 526-532.

Qiyi Chen, Yunliang Xu, Zhibin Lv, Ruming Xie, Hongxin Zhao, Budong Chen. Comparative study of imaging and pathology of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related lymphoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 526-532.

目的

比较不同病理类型的获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)相关淋巴瘤(ARL)的电子计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振(MR)影像特征。

方法

收集首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院2008年1月1日~2018年10月1日ARL确诊患者,对确诊时的临床资料和影像资料进行回顾性分析,为横断面调查研究。确诊经穿刺或手术病理证实。

结果

收集ARL患者共83例,其中弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者48例(57.8%)[包括未分型17例,生发中心(GC)18例,非生发中心(NGC)13例],Burkitt淋巴瘤(BL)患者23例(27.7%),其他少见类型淋巴瘤患者12例(14.5%)。根据以上病理类型分为3组:DLBCL组、BL组和其他类型组。BL组患者CD4+ T细胞计数中位数为201个/μl,高于DLBCL组患者(78个/μl)和其他类型组(74个/μl),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 6.603,P = 0.037)。HIV载量(χ2 = 0.396,P = 0.820)、AIDS病程(F = 1.342、P = 0.267)及是否ART治疗(χ2 = 3.084、P = 0.544)在不同病理类型患者间差异均无统计学意义。结内和头部ARL最常见,其次为消化道(以胃和小肠多见)、肝脏,不同病理类型患者间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.083、P = 0.959)。结内病变形态以结节、肿块为主,头部病变为环形强化,消化道可见"假性动脉瘤样"扩张且不伴肠梗阻征象,而实质脏器病变多数不伴血管受侵、瘤栓。Ann Arbor分期1期患者20例(31.7%),2期患者14例(22.2%),3期患者8例(12.7%),4期患者21例(33.3%),不同病理类型患者的Ann Arbor分期间差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 4.948、P = 0.547)。Ki67(+)≥ 90%患者在DLBCL组(8例、21.1%)和BL组(12例、31.6%)中例数均高于其他类型组(χ2 = 6.016、P = 0.049),但DLBCL组和BL组患者Ki67阳性率构成比差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 2.440、P = 0.118)。结内淋巴瘤患者Ki67阳性率与影像所见肿块坏死范围、肿块大小无相关性(Spearman相关系数R = 0.224、0.059,P = 0.199、0.857)。

结论

不同病理类型的AIDS相关淋巴瘤同一部位的影像表现类似,结内淋巴瘤Ki67阳性率不能预测影像所见肿块大小和坏死范围。

Objective

To compare the imaging characteristics of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) associated lymphoma (ARL) with different pathological types.

Methods

Patients with ARL were collected from Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1st, 2008 to October 1st, 2018. The clinical data and imaging data were analyzed by cross-sectional investigation, retrospectively. Diagnosis is confirmed by puncture or surgery.

Results

A total of 83 cases with ARL were collected, including 48 cases (57.8%) with diffused large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [(17 cases unclassified, 18 cases with germinal center (GC), 13 cases with non-germinal center (NGC)]. There were 23 cases (27.7%) with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and 12 cases (14.5%) with other rare types of lymphoma. Patients were divided into three groups according to pathological types: DLBCL group, BL group and other types group. The median CD4+ T cell count of patients in BL group was 201 cells/μl, which was significantly higher than that of DLBCL group (78 cells/μl) and other types (74 cells/μl) (χ2 = 6.603, P = 0.037). There was no significant difference among the patients with different pathological types in viral load of HIV (χ2 = 0.396, P = 0.820), AIDS course (F = 1.342, P = 0.267) and whether or not taking ART therapy (χ2 = 3.084, P = 0.544). Lymph node and cerebral forms of ARL was the most common, followed by digestive tracts (stomach and small intestine) and liver, but there was no significant difference among patients with different pathological types (χ2 = 0.083, P = 0.959). Nodules or masses were the main forms in lymph node, and head lesions were ring enhancement. "Pseudoaneurysm like" dilatation was seen in digestive tract without intestinal obstruction, while parenchymal visceral lesions were not accompanied by vascular invasion and tumor embolus. According to Ann Arbor 4-stage classification: there were 20 cases (31.7%) of Ann Arbor stage 1, 14 cases (22.2%) of stage 2, 8 cases (12.7%) of stage 3, 21 cases (33.3%) of stage 4. There was no significant difference in Ann Arbor scores between patients with different pathological types (χ2 = 4.948, P = 0.547). The number of patients with Ki67(+) ≥ 90% in DLBCL group (8 cases, 21.1%) and BL group (12 cases, 31.6%) were significantly higher than that of other groups (χ2 = 6.016, P = 0.049). There was no significant difference in Ki67 positive ratio between DLBCL group and BL group (χ2 = 2.440, P = 0.118). There was no correlation between the positive rate of Ki67 with tumor necrosis and tumor size (Spearman correlation coefficient R = 0.224, 0.059; P = 0.199, 0.857).

Conclusions

The imaging findings of different pathological types of ARL are similar and the positive rate of Ki67 could not predict the size and necrotic extent of the tumor.

表1 不同病理类型AIDS相关淋巴瘤患者CD4+ T细胞计数、HIV载量、AIDS病程以及是否启动ART治疗的差异
表2 不同病理类型AIDS相关淋巴瘤患者受累部位、分期、形态及特殊征象[例(%)]
图1 Burkitt淋巴瘤典型患者CT平扫和CT增强扫描
图2 弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(非生发中心来源)典型患者MR表现
图3 Burkitt淋巴瘤和弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者病理结果(HE染色,× 100)
图4 Burkitt淋巴瘤典型患者MR表现
图5 B细胞淋巴瘤典型患者CT表现
图6 弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的CT表现
表3 AIDS相关淋巴瘤结内肿块Ki67阳性率与影像所见坏死区、病变大小相关性
[1]
Ramaswami R, Chia G, Dalla PA, et al. Evolution of HIV-associated lymphoma over 3 decades[J]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr,2016,72(2):177-183.
[2]
Gopal S, Patel MR, Yanik EL, et al. Temporal trends in presentation and survival for HIV-associated lymphoma in the antiretroviral therapy era[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2013,105(16):1221-1229.
[3]
Ji Y, Lu H. Malignancies in HIV-Infected and AIDS Patients[R]. Infectious Agents Associated Cancers: Epidemiology and Molecular Biology,2017:167-179.
[4]
李露,罗春香,董超. 艾滋病相关肿瘤的研究进展[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(2):140-143.
[5]
张文浩,叶丽芳,雷永霞, 等. 纵隔淋巴瘤出现坏死的特点及相关因素分析[J]. 实用放射学杂志,2014,30(8):1310-1312, 1399.
[6]
Cesarman E. Pathology of lymphoma in HIV[J]. Curr Opin Oncol,2013,25(5):487-494.
[7]
Taylor JG, Liapis K, Gribben JG. The role of the tumor microenvironment in HIV-associated lymphomas[J]. Biomark Med,2015,9(5):473-482.
[8]
Besson C, Lancar R, Prevot S, et al. Outcomes for HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern combined antiretroviral therapy era[J]. AIDS,2017,31(18):2493-2501.
[9]
Ota Y, Hishima T, Mochizuki M, et al. Classification of AIDS-related lymphoma cases between 1987 and 2012 in Japan based on the WHO classification of lymphomas, fourth edition[J]. Cancer Med,2014,3(1):143-153.
[10]
Karia SJ, McArdle D. AIDS-related primary CNS lymphoma[J]. Lancet,2017,389(10085):2238.
[11]
Frampas E. Lymphomas: Basic points that radiologists should know[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging,2013,94(2):131-144.
[12]
施纯子,施裕新. 重视艾滋病相关肿瘤的影像检查[J]. 放射学实践,2015,30(9):894-895.
[13]
黎美. MRI鉴别诊断脑原发淋巴瘤与高级别胶质瘤[J]. 实用放射学杂志,2018,34(1):139-141.
[14]
余晖,余永程,刘静, 等. 脑淋巴瘤病的临床和MRI表现[J]. 中华放射学杂志,2018,52(1):58-60.
[15]
Abe Y, Narita K, Kobayashi H, et al. Clinical value of abnormal findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Ann Hematol,2018, 97(12):2345-2352.
[16]
Smith AB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Rushing EJ. From the archives of the AFIP: central nervous system infections associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: radiologic-pathologic correlation[J]. Radiographics,2008,28(7):2033-2058.
[17]
Siani LM, Siani A, Ricci V, et al. Burkitt’s lymphoma of the caecum in a patient with AIDS: clinical case and review of the literature[J]. Minerva Chir,2009,64(2):229-233.
[18]
Danilov AV, Pilichowska M, Danilova OV, et al. AIDS-related Burkitt lymphoma--a heterogeneous disease?[J]. Leuk Res,2008,32(12):1939-1941.
[19]
Russell MD, Singh-Ranger D, Crosbie J. An AIDS-defining neoplasm in a 30-year-old man on highly active antiretroviral therapy: a forgotten diagnosis?[J]. BMJ Case Rep,2014,2014.
[20]
Corti M, Villafane MF, Souto L, et al. Burkitt’s lymphoma of the duodenum in a patient with AIDS[J]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop,2007,40(3):338-340.
[21]
Dinh MH, Matkowskyj KA, Stosor V. Colorectal lymphoma in the setting of HIV: case report and review of the literature[J]. AIDS Patient Care STDS,2009,23(4):227-230.
[22]
Goto M, Onizawa K, Yanagawa T, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma in oral cavity of Japanese patient[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2012,70(8):1885-1890.
[23]
White W, Blunden M, McAdoo SP, et al. Immunodeficiency-associated renal Burkitt lymphoma[J]. Br J Haematol,2015,168(6):769.
[24]
Mascarenhas JG, Araujo JF, Bolzan TV, et al. Nasopharyngeal Burkitt lymphoma as an early AIDS manifestation[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol,2014,80(6):546-548.
[25]
Tonolini M, Matacena G, Bianco R. Anorectal opportunistic diseases in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients: spectrum of cross-sectional imaging findings[J]. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol,2012,41(6):220-232.
[26]
White W, Blunden M, McAdoo SP, et al. Immunodeficiency-associated renal Burkitt lymphoma[J]. Br J Haematol,2015,168(6):769.
[1] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[2] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[3] 吕衡, 董理聪, 谢海琴, 赵卓非, 刘俐, 孙德胜. 基于CT-超声对照的肝脏局灶性病变超声漏诊状况分析:一项单中心横断面质量控制调查报告[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 712-716.
[4] 岳志浩, 王晶, 闫子玉, 葛娜, 许向亮, 单小峰, 崔念晖. 牙槽外科相关舌神经损伤早期诊断及治疗中磁共振神经成像技术的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 413-417.
[5] 梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.
[6] 梅津熠, 王燕, 瞿旻, 董振阳, 周增辉, 沈显琦, 李嘉伦, 高旭. 机器人前列腺癌根治术中"膀胱外中叶"的处理[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 429-433.
[7] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[8] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[9] 孙钢. 超高场磁共振成像的发展现状与展望[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 369-372.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[13] 吴钰娴, 冯亚园, 霍雷, 贾宁阳, 张娟. 原发性肝脏淋巴瘤的影像学诊断价值研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 349-353.
[14] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[15] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
阅读次数
全文


摘要