切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 297 -301. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2017.03.019

临床论著

脑室腹腔分流术后感染的影响因素及手术操作改良
李冰1()   
  1. 1. 476000 商丘市,河南省商丘市第一人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-12 出版日期:2017-06-15
  • 通信作者: 李冰

Related factors of postoperative infection and improvement of surgical operation after ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Bing Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shangqiu First People’s Hospital, Shangqiu 476000, China
  • Received:2016-02-12 Published:2017-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Bing Li
引用本文:

李冰. 脑室腹腔分流术后感染的影响因素及手术操作改良[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 297-301.

Bing Li. Related factors of postoperative infection and improvement of surgical operation after ventriculoperitoneal shunt[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(03): 297-301.

目的

分析脑室腹腔分流术(VPS)术后感染的相关因素,为临床有效预防控制术后感染提供依据;并探讨对手术进行改良的方法,以降低术后感染率。

方法

选取290例次采用改良常规VPS治疗脑积水作为改良组,釆用常规治疗脑积水188例次作为对照组,比较两组患者术后感染率。应用SPSS 20.0统计软件分析改良组患者的年龄分布、脑积水类型及术前状况等不同因素条件下的术后感染率,并对感染因素进行分析。

结果

改良组202例患者临床应用改良式的VPS治疗共290次,感染率为6.55%(19/290);对照组138例患者,应用常规的VPS治疗共188次,感染率为13.83%(26/188),改良组患者的术后感染率显著低于对照组(χ2 = 5.022、P = 0.021)。改良组和对照组患者中早期感染分别为13例(68.42%)和20例(76.92%),但差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.724、P = 0.415)。改良组患者290次手术中,年龄< 1岁与≥ 1岁患者感染率差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 10.131、P = 0.001)。预防性使用抗菌药物(χ2 = 4.297、P = 0.039)、骨膜完整保留及缝合包埋穿刺孔(χ2 = 8.924、P = 0.005)和小的弧形头部皮肤切口(χ2 = 7.209、P = 0.015)与术后感染相关。

结论

预防性使用抗菌药物、骨膜完整保留及缝合包埋穿刺孔、小的弧形头部皮肤切口为术后感染的保护因素,有利于降低术后感染率。

Objective

To analyze the related factors of postoperative infection after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and to provide the basis for the effective prevention and control of postoperative infection; and to explore the methods to improve the operation for reducing the rate of postoperative infection.

Methods

Total of 290 cases were selected as the improved group who were given improvement of conventional VPS in the treatment of hydrocephalus, while 188 cases with the conventional treatment of hydrocephalus were selected as the control group, the rate of postoperative infection were compared between the two groups. The age distribution, hydrocephalus type, preoperative status of different factors between the incidence of postoperative infection, and the infection factors of patients in the improved group were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 statistical analysis software, while the related factors of postoperative infection were analyzed.

Results

Among the modified group, 202 patients were treated with modified VPS for 290 times, and the infection rate was 6.55% (19/290). The control group of 138 patients, the use of conventional VPS 188 case-times, the infection rate was 13.83% (26/188), the postoperative infection rate of the modified group was significantly lower than that of the control group (χ2 = 5.022, P = 0.021). The early infection in the modified and control groups were 13 (68.42%) and 20 (76.92%), respectively, but with no significant differences (χ2 = 0.724, P = 0.415). The early infection in the modified and control groups were 13 (68.42%) and 20 (76.92%), respectively, with significant differences (χ2 = 10.131, P = 0.001). Prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents (χ2 = 4.297, P = 0.039), complete preservation of periosteum and suture, embedding of puncture holes (χ2 = 8.924, P = 0.005) and small arc head skin incision (χ2 = 7.209, P = 0.015) were associated with postoperative infection.

Conclusions

Prophylactic use of antibiotics, complete preservation of periosteum and suture embedding puncture holes, small arc head skin incision were all the protective factors of postoperative infection, which were helpful to reduce the rate of postoperative infection.

表1 改良组与对照组患者的临床特点
表2 改良组患者术后感染率
表3 改良组患者术后感染的影响因素
表4 术后感染相关因素的Logistic回归分析
[1]
甘晓, 张东波, 刘向业, 等. 神经内镜联合不同抗菌药物治疗脑室-腹腔分流术后颅内感染的疗效分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(22):5156-5158.
[2]
呼铁民, 王维兴, 王昆鹏, 等. 神经内镜联合利奈唑胺在脑室-腹腔分流术后重度颅内感染的应用研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2015,18(6):692-695.
[3]
郑虎, 张红波, 袁辉胜. 脑室-腹腔分流术后感染16例保守治疗[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2016,13(8):495-496.
[4]
朱宏伟, 刘希尧, 谭国伟, 等. 1033例神经外科择期手术感染分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(22):5153-5155.
[5]
凌士营, 蒋辰, 牛朝诗. 个体化理念在脑室腹腔分流手术中的应用[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2016(5):297-301.
[6]
徐海东, 郝兴龙, 马超群, 等. 腹腔镜辅助下及常规脑室腹腔分流术治疗脑积水的Meta分析[J]. 医学临床研究,2016,33(11):2184-2189.
[7]
Habibi Z, Ertiaei A, Nikdad MS, et al. Predicting ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection in children with hydrocephalus using artificial neural network[J]. Childs Nerv Syst,2016,32(11):1-9.
[8]
Taek JY, Pyung LS, Ik CJ. An improved one-stage operation of cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patient with hydrocephalus and large cranial defect[J]. Korean J Neurotrauma,2015,11(2):93-99.
[9]
Raffa G, Marseglia L, Gitto E, et al. Antibiotic-impregnated catheters reduce ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection rate in high-risk newborns and infants[J]. Childs Nerv Syst,2015,31(7):1129-1138.
[10]
Maruyama H, Nakata Y, Kanazawa A, et al. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt outcomes among infants[J]. Acta Medica Okayama,2015,69(2):87-93.
[11]
Andreasen TH, Holst AV, Lilja A, et al. Valved or valveless ventriculoperitoneal shunting in the treatment of post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus: a population-based consecutive cohort study[J]. Acta Neurochirurgica,2015,158(2):261-270.
[12]
Bir SC, Sapkota S, Maiti TK, et al. Evaluation of ventriculoperitoneal shunt-related complications in intracranial meningioma with hydrocephalus[J]. J Neurol Surg B,2017,78(1):30-36.
[13]
Jeyaselvasenthilkumar T, Ramesh V, Sekar C, et al. A study to formulate a strategy to prevent ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection[J]. IJNS,2015,4(2):74-79.
[14]
Esmaeilzadeh M, Islamian AP, Lang JM, et al. An unusual cause of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection[J]. JAAPA,2015,28(8):39-42.
[15]
Çağan E, Soysal A, Şeker A, et al. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection and treatment in children[J]. Cukurova Med J,2015,40(1):72-79.
[16]
Xu S, Sheng W, Qiu Y, et al. An unusual complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: urinary bladder stone case report and literature review[J]. Iran Red Crescent Med J,2016,18(1):e26049.
[17]
Nocuń A, Mosiewicz A, Kaczmarczyk R, et al. Early brain perfusion improvement after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus evaluated by 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT-Preliminary report[J]. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur,2015,18(2):84-88.
[18]
万意, 张淼, 陈寒春, 等. 脑积水脑室腹腔分流术后颅内感染的治疗[J]. 浙江临床医学,2015,17(10):1773-1774.
[19]
张程达. 婴幼儿脑积水脑室腹腔分流术后并发脑软化的危险因素分析[D]. 郑州大学,2016.
[20]
段国庆, 高明. 正常压力性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流手术的时机和疗效[J]. 中国实用医刊,2015,34(22):112-113.
[21]
田鹏, 王维军. 腹腔镜辅助脑室-腹腔分流术治疗脑积水的疗效观察[J]. 中外医疗,2016,35(18):67-69.
[22]
马超群, 杨旸, 袁玉会, 等. 腹腔镜辅助下脑室腹腔分流术治疗脑积水的体会[J]. 中国医科大学学报,2016,45(2):183-184.
[23]
江俊毅, 罗飚, 邓智峰, 等. 脑室-腹腔分流术治疗脑积水的疗效分析[J]. 吉林医学,2015,36(4):627-629.
[24]
金天庭. 脑室-腹腔分流术治疗特发性正常压力性脑积水临床疗效的研究[D]. 苏州大学,2015.
[25]
解虎涛, 程宏伟, 李长元, 等. 腰大池-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水疗效的系统评价[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2016,43(5):385-390.
[26]
施炜城, 李伟, 梅文忠, 等. 脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后分流管堵塞的原因分析[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志,2015,14(6):561-563.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 刘欢, 邢皓, 常正奇, 张记. 机械敏感性离子通道蛋白Piezo1在感染相关疾病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 263-269.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[6] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[9] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[10] 胡菊英, 李银华, 洪兰, 王宏勇, 丁先军, 李承美, 谭心海. 儿童感染大叶性肺炎与支气管肺炎临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 813-816.
[11] 邢嘉翌, 龚佳晟, 祝佳佳, 陆群. 肺癌化疗患者继发肺部感染的病原菌耐药性及炎症因子变化分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 714-718.
[12] 王石林, 叶继章, 丘向艳, 陈桂青, 邹晓敏. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病真菌感染风险早期预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 773-776.
[13] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要