切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 190 -193. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2017.02.018

临床论著

病毒载量对HBV感染妇女母婴结局的影响
张保霞1()   
  1. 1. 252500 冠县,山东省冠县中心医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-27 出版日期:2017-04-15
  • 通信作者: 张保霞

Influence of viral load on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with HBV infection

Baoxia Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Central Hospital of Guanxian, Guanxian 252500, China
  • Received:2015-12-27 Published:2017-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Baoxia Zhang
引用本文:

张保霞. 病毒载量对HBV感染妇女母婴结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 190-193.

Baoxia Zhang. Influence of viral load on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with HBV infection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 190-193.

目的

探讨乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)载量对妊娠妇女母婴结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析本院2010年11月至2014年12月收治的住院分娩孕妇共1 783例,其中HBV携带者631例,非HBV携带者1 152例;根据HBV DNA载量分组,HBV DNA载量≥ 1.0 × 103 U/ml者为阳性组(281例),HBV DNA载量< 1.0 × 103 U/ml者为阴性组(350例),同时收集无HBV携带孕妇1 152例为对照组。比较每组妊娠妇女分娩孕周、剖宫产率、住院时间、妊娠期并发症(早产、产后出血、妊娠期高血压、胎儿窘迫)以及新生儿出生体重、新生儿窒息和高胆红素血症发生情况。

结果

各组妊娠妇女分娩周数、剖宫产率和住院时间差异均无统计学意义(F = 1.750、P = 0.175,χ2= 1.575、P = 0.230,F = 0.982、P = 0.465);三组妊娠妇女早产发生率差异具有统计学意义(F = 10.148、P = 0.006);阳性组患者早产发生率为8.84%,显著高于对照组(3.73%)(χ2= 13.328、P < 0.001);三组妊娠妇女产后出血、妊娠期高血压和胎儿窘迫等发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05);但阳性组和阴性组妇女出血量则显著高于对照组(t = 92.823、8.714,P均< 0.001),阳性组和阴性组妇女产后出血量差异无统计学意义。三组新生儿体重差异具有统计学意义(F = 137.240、P < 0.001),而阳性组和阴性组新生儿体重显著低于对照组新生儿(t = 15.243、14.871,P均< 0.001);三组新生儿窒息发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 3.185、P = 0.203)。各组新生儿高胆红素血症发生率差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 74.292、P < 0.001),进一步进组间比较发现阳性组和阴性组新生儿高胆红素血症发生率显著高于对照组(χ2 = 58.949、64.060,P均< 0.001),而阳性组和阴性组新生儿高胆红素血症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.012、P = 0.913)。

结论

HBV DNA载量升高时,胎儿早产发生率、产妇产后出血量和新生儿高胆红素血症发生率均增加,但新生儿体重下降,而对妊娠期其他并发症无显著影响。

Objective

To investigate the effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA load on outcomes of maternal and neonatal.

Methods

The clinical data of 1 783 pregnant women were collected in our hospital from November 2010 to December 2014, including 631 cases of HBV carriers, 1 152 cases of non-HBV carriers. All cases were divided into positive group (281 cases) with HBV DNA ≥ 1.0 × 103 U/ml and negative group (350 cases) with HBV DNA < 1.0 × 103 U/ml, while the HBV negative pregnant women were collected as control group. The pregnant weeks of childbirth, gestational age of delivery, rate of cesarean section, days of stay in hospital, complications (such as premature delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, gestational hypertension or fetal distress), and birth weight, neonatal asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia occurrence of newborn were compared, respectively.

Results

There were no significant differences of pregnant weeks of childbirth, cesarean section rate and the days of stay in hospital among the three groups (F = 1.750, P = 0.175; χ2 = 1.575, P = 0.230; F = 0.982, P = 0.465), but the incidences of preterm birth among the three groups were significantly different (F = 10.148, P = 0.006), and the incidence of premature delivery in the positive group was 8.84%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (3.73%), with significant difference (χ2= 13.328, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, pregnancy induced hypertension and fetal distress among the three groups (all P > 0.05), but the bleeding volume of patients in the positive and negative groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (t = 92.823, 8.714; all P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in postpartum haemorrhage amount between the positive group and negative group. The neonatal weights of three groups were significantly difference (F = 137.240, P < 0.001), and the neonatal weights of the positive group and negative group were significantly lower than that of the control group (t = 15.243, 14.871; all P < 0.001). There was no significant different in the incidence of neonatal asphyxia among the three groups (χ2 = 3.185, P = 0.203), the incidence of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia among the three groups were significantly different (χ2 = 58.949, 64.060; all P < 0.001), which was not significantly different between positive and negative groups (χ2 = 0.012, P = 0.913).

Conclusions

With HBV DNA load increasing, the incidence of preterm labor, maternal postpartum haemorrhage amount and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia increased, while the neonatal weight decreased and had no influence on other complications during pregnancy.

表1 各组妊娠妇女分娩一般资料
表2 两组患者和对照组妊娠妇女治疗后的疗效
表3 各组新生儿的结局
1
卜一畅,刘海燕,孔德川, 等. 妊娠合并隐匿性或显性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染对早产发生率的影响[J]. 复旦学报(医学版),2014,41(6):779-783.
2
丁伯泉. 慢性乙型肝炎妊娠晚期HBeAg及HBV DNA对产后肝脏炎症的影响[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2015,(13):1881-1882, 1885.
3
Nardiello S, Orsini A, Gentile I, et al. HBV and pregnancy[J]. Infez Med,2011,19(3):139-145.
4
中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2010年版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2011,19(1):13-24.
5
Eefsiniotis I, Tsoumakas K, Vezali E, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth in women with chronic hepatitis B virus infection[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2010,3(110):241-244.
6
周玉华. 妊娠合并乙型肝炎病毒感染对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 海南医学,2012,23(1):40-41.
7
余涛,李从荣,朱晓宣, 等. 慢性乙型肝炎患者PLT, PAIg, HBV DNA载量的检测及关系探讨[J]. 临床血液学杂志(输血与检验版),2011,24(5):579-582.
8
Bozkaya H, Bozdayi M, Turkyilmaz R, et al. Circulating IL-2, IL-10 and TNF-alpha in chronic hepatitis B: their relations to HBeAg status and the activity of liver disease[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2000,47(36):1675-1679.
9
夏世文,周茜茜,胡玉莲, 等. 宫内感染早产儿血清及脑脊液炎性因子与脑损伤的关系[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2015,30(18):1425-1427.
10
伊诺,姜秀娟,梁东竹, 等. 乙型肝炎病毒感染对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇及新生儿的影响[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2015,9(2):249-252.
11
Giles ML, Visvanathan K, Ioewin SR, et al. Chronic hepatitis B infection and pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol Survey,2012,67(1):37-44.
12
丁伯泉. 慢性乙型肝炎妊娠晚期HBeAg及HBV DNA对产后肝脏炎症的影响[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2015,(13):1881-1882, 1885.
13
梁海英,黄启涛,周琳, 等. 慢性HBV感染对产后出血影响的Meta分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2016,32(12):2035-2040.
14
周影,赵勇,包淑平, 等. 乙肝免疫球蛋白阻断高乙肝病毒载量孕妇母婴传播研究[J]. 辽宁医学院学报,2013,34(3):19-21.
15
吴小妹,凌奕,李跃萍, 等. 无症状乙肝病毒携带状态对妊娠期糖尿病及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 海南医学院学报,2011,17(9):1244-1246.
16
翟红卫,焦瑞芬,张瑞萍, 等. 乙肝病毒载量对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2013,12(23):1911-1913.
17
赵琳,李琳霞,李艳红, 等. 早产儿早产原因及并发症分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2014,9(5):640-643.
18
古丽,黄薇,董文斌, 等. 早产儿高胆红素血症与肾损伤的关系研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,11(1):62-66.
19
杨树杰,易海英,汪珍珍, 等. 晚期早产儿高胆红素血症危险因素分析[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2014,32(3):214-217.
20
张媛,郭佩玲,王青青, 等. 妊娠期慢性乙型肝炎病毒携带者病毒载量与妊娠结局的相关性[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版),2014,35(6):866-869.
[1] 卢天祺, 张巍, 周康, 毕士玉, 张羽, 杨秀华. 血流向量成像技术在不同Child-Pugh分级乙肝患者左心功能评价中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 352-360.
[2] 刘莉莉, 贾建茹, 张晶, 周大琼, 刘江雨, 曹振环. 单纯慢性乙型肝炎患者与慢性乙型肝炎合并肝脂肪变患者的临床特征横断面研究[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 270-277.
[3] 张雨, 杨松. 世界卫生组织《慢性乙型肝炎预防、诊断、关怀及治疗指南(2024年版)》解读[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 129-134.
[4] 陈观梅, 左璇, 廖宝林. 慢性乙型肝炎新型免疫治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 7-10.
[5] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[6] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[7] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[8] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[9] 胡静, 杨秀锦, 侯志云. HBV感染患者外周血ISGs表达水平变化及其与干扰素治疗疗效的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 343-347.
[10] 江浩, 余宏圣, 杨碧兰, 阿布都克尤木·斯马依, 吴斌, 杨逸冬. 基于列线图模型对慢性乙型肝炎合并肝脏脂肪变性患者并发晚期肝纤维化的临床预测[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 114-120.
[11] 王秀, 王义国. 益生菌联合恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化临床疗效的meta分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 164-171.
[12] 黄圣楷, 许斌, 苏健, 孙龙. 海南省2010~2020年乙型肝炎流行趋势的时间序列分析及预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 555-561.
[13] 李玛, 闫凌, 席云, 李尚霞, 朱冬林. HBV RNA用于监测慢性乙型肝炎患者临床治愈的研究和应用[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 70-74.
[14] 刘春林, 刘畅, 赵东岩, 李端萍, 刘建梅, 罗秋林. 利用室内质控与能力验证数据评定HBV DNA和HCV RNA测量不确定度[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 91-96.
[15] 郭楠, 徐学俊. 富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯在慢性乙型肝炎患者中诱导的范科尼综合征并低磷软骨病一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 173-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?