切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 182 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2025.03.007

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

基于知信行理论的延续性干预在艾拉光动力治疗高危人类乳头瘤病毒持续感染合并宫颈上皮内瘤样变Ⅰ效果的研究
王鑫, 吴冬玲(), 白光霞, 闫会文, 刘静, 李红   
  1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院皮肤性病科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-12 出版日期:2025-06-15
  • 通信作者: 吴冬玲
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院院内基金(No. DTZLX201805)

Effect of continuous intervention based on the knowledge-attitude-practice theory on the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for patients with high-risk human papillomavirus persistent infection complicated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅰ

Xin Wang, Dongling Wu(), Guangxia Bai, Huiwen Yan, Jing Liu, Hong Li   

  1. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100015 Beijing, China
  • Received:2024-11-12 Published:2025-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Dongling Wu
引用本文:

王鑫, 吴冬玲, 白光霞, 闫会文, 刘静, 李红. 基于知信行理论的延续性干预在艾拉光动力治疗高危人类乳头瘤病毒持续感染合并宫颈上皮内瘤样变Ⅰ效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 182-186.

Xin Wang, Dongling Wu, Guangxia Bai, Huiwen Yan, Jing Liu, Hong Li. Effect of continuous intervention based on the knowledge-attitude-practice theory on the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for patients with high-risk human papillomavirus persistent infection complicated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅰ[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 182-186.

目的

探讨基于知信行(KAP)理论的延续性干预对高危人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)持续感染合并宫颈上皮内瘤样变Ⅰ(CINⅠ)患者艾拉光动力治疗(ALA-PDT)效果的影响。

方法

采用便利抽样法选取2022年7月1日至2023年6月30日于首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院皮肤性病门诊接受诊治的高危HPV持续感染合并CINⅠ的患者共120例,随机数字表法分为对照组(60例)和观察组(60例)。两组患者均接受艾拉光动力治疗,对照组采用常规治疗,观察组在常规治疗基础上实施基于KAP理论的延续性干预。采用独立样本t检验比较两组患者在干预前、6次光动力术后、术后3个月和术后6个月的自我效能(GSES评分)和生活质量(SF-36评分)指标;应用卡方检验比较两组患者术后3个月和6个月的HPV分型和阴道镜复查结果。

结果

治疗前对照组和观察组患者GSES和SF-36评分差异无统计学意义(t = 0.852、P = 0.398,t = 0.012、P = 0.991)。6次光动力术后、术后3个月和6个月,观察组患者GSES评分分别为(25.63 ± 4.34)、(30.09 ± 4.34)和(34.21 ± 4.56),显著高于对照组[(22.23 ± 4.05)、(25.78 ± 4.57)和(29.56 ± 5.13)](t = 3.137、3.746、3.711,P = 0.003、< 0.001、< 0.001);SF-36评分分别为(72.73 ± 3.58)、(80.25 ± 4.20)和(89.34 ± 4.65),高于对照组(64.59 ± 3.47)、(72.78 ± 3.96)和(78.79 ± 4.11)(t = 8.547、7.088、9.311,P均< 0.001),差异均有统计学意义。光动力术后 3个月和6个月,观察组患者HPV分型转阴率分别为73.3%(44/60)和70.0%(42/60),高于对照组的65%(39/60)和61.7%(37/60),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 15.98、13.76,P均< 0.001);术后6个月,观察组病变逆转率为80.0%(48/60),高于对照组(68.3%、41/60),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 16.89、P < 0.001),提示观察组疗效优于对照组。

结论

基于KAP理论的延续性干预可显著提升高危HPV持续感染并发CINⅠ患者的自我效能和生活质量,优化患者的临床结局。

Objective

To investigate the effect of continuity care intervention based on the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) theory on the clinical outcomes of patients with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) persistent infection complicated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade Ⅰ (CIN Ⅰ) undergoing aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT).

Methods

Total of 120 patients with HR-HPV persistent infection and CIN Ⅰ diagnosed at the Dermatovenereology Outpatient Department of Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from July 1st 2022 to June 30th 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method. Patients were randomly divided into control group (60 cases) and observation group (60 cases) by random number table method. Both groups received ALA-PDT treatment. Patients in control group received routine care, while observation group underwent additional continuity care intervention based on KAP theory. Indexes of generalized self-efficacy scale (GSES scores) and short form health survey (SF-36 scores) were compared between the two groups at baseline, after 6 times of ALA-PDT, 3-month and 6-month after ALA-PDT by independent samples t-test. HPV genotyping results and colposcopy reexamine findings were evaluated at 3 months and 6 months after ALA-PDT by Chi-square test.

Results

GSES and SF-36 scores between control group and observation group before treatment were not significantly different (t = 0.852, P = 0.398; t = 0.012,P = 0.991). After 6 times of ALA-PDT, 3-month and 6-month after ALA-PDT, the GSES scores of patients in observation group were (25.63 ± 4.34), (30.09 ± 4.34) and (34.21 ± 4.56), significantly higher than those of the control group [(22.23 ± 4.05), (25.78 ± 4.57) and (29.56 ± 5.13)], with significant differences (t = 3.137, 3.746, 3.711; P = 0.003, < 0.001, < 0.001); while the SF-36 scores of patients in observation group were (72.73 ± 3.58), (80.25 ± 4.20) and (89.34 ± 4.65), significantly higher than those of the control group [(64.59 ± 3.47), (72.78 ± 3.96) and (78.79 ± 4.11)], with significant differences (t = 8.547, 7.088, 9.311; all P < 0.001). At 3 and 6 months after ALA-PDT, the HPV-negative conversion rates of patients in observation group were 73.3% (44/60) and 70.4% (42/60), respectively, significantly higher than those of the control group [65% (39/60) and 61.7% (37/60)], with significant differences (χ2 = 15.98, 13.76; both P < 0.001). At 6 months after ALA-PDT, the rate of lesion reversal in observation group was 80.0% (48/60), significantly higher than that of control group [68.3% (41/60)], with significant difference (χ2 = 16.89, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Continuity care intervention based on the KAP theory can significantly improve the self-efficacy and life quality of patients with HR-HPV persistent infection complicated with CIN Ⅰ, and optimize the clinical outcome of patients.

表1 对照组和观察组HR-HPV持续感染合并CINⅠ患者治疗前后不同时间点GSES评分(
表2 对照组和观察组HR-HPV持续感染合并CINⅠ患者治疗前后不同时间点SF-36评分(
表3 对照组和观察组HR-HPV持续感染合并CINⅠ患者光动力术后HPV转阴率及病变改善 [例(%)]
[1]
冯明月, 闫萍. 宫颈上皮内瘤变诊治现状[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2020,41(4):480-483.
[2]
李媛媛, 嵇玉蓉, 马海英. 218例女性HPV感染亚型分布合并支原体感染情况及与宫颈癌和癌前病变的关系[J]. 解放军医药杂志,2022,34(2):48-52.
[3]
梅士豪, 王悦. 光动力疗法在女性生殖道疾病中的应用进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志,2023,50(2):185-189.
[4]
任佳, 周丽珠, 蔡春芳. 智能远程系统的延续性护理对高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染患者心理状态及自我管理能力的影响[J]. 中国当代医药,2022,29(3):44-47.
[5]
谭莉萍. 女性生殖道HPV持续感染的临床治疗效果观察[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2022,9(36):76-78.
[6]
Lopez CR, Antoni MH, Pereira D, et al. Stress management, depression, and immune status in lower-income racial/ethnic minority women co-infected with HIV and HPV[J]. J Appl Biobehav Res,2013,18(1):37-57.
[7]
Ferreira AR, Ramalho AC, Marques M, et al. The interplay between antiviral signalling and carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus infections[J]. Cancers (Basel),2020,12(3):646.
[8]
申萍, 黄云婷, 唐秋艳. 知-信-行理论配合阶段性健康教育对高血压合并冠心病患者疾病认知程度及遵医行为的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(17):5-8.
[9]
蔡文平, 钱敏, 廖月霞, 等. 基于知信行理论的延续性护理方案在初治肺结核患者中的应用研究[J]. 护士进修杂志,2023,38(23):2191-2195.
[10]
李乐, 彭丽秀. 不同型别高危HPV感染与CIN及宫颈癌的时效性研究[J]. 湘南学院学报(医学版),2020,22(1):9-13.
[11]
中华医学会皮肤性病学分会光动力治疗研究中心, 中国康复医学会皮肤病康复专业委员会, 中国医学装备协会皮肤病与皮肤美容分会光医学治疗装备学组. 氨基酮戊酸光动力疗法皮肤科临床应用指南(2021版)[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,2021,54(1):1-9.
[12]
刘静, 张吟真, 陈敏, 等. 膦甲酸钠清除宫颈高危型HPV持续感染的临床效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2019,4(29):34-35.
[13]
聂淑容, 陈科名, 余燕. 宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切术后复发因素调查及高危型HPV检查的应用价值[J]. 解放军医药杂志,2019,31(8):21-24.
[14]
王燕, 温先勇, 杨梅, 等. 持续高危HPV感染的宫颈病变患者免疫及其调节功能探讨[J]. 现代预防医学,2019,46(9):1600-1603.
[15]
赵卉. 派特灵治疗宫颈病变手术后持续高危HPV感染疗效观察[J]. 基层医学论坛,2019,23(14):2071-2072.
[16]
Schwarzer R, Aristi B. Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures[J]. World Psychol,1997,3(1-2):177-190.
[17]
Zhang JX, Schwarzer R. Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-efficacy Scale[J]. Psychologia, 1995,38(3):174-181.
[18]
Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,1998,51(11):903-912.
[19]
赵红霞, 袁媛, 郑鑫. 基于知信行理论的延续性护理对冠心病患者服药依从性, 生活质量及自我效能的影响[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志,2020,14(4):356-361.
[20]
郭奇桑, 刁雯静, 谢康云, 等. 艾拉-光动力疗法治疗持续性高危型HPV感染的前瞻性初步研究[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015,24(9):669-671.
[21]
Drolet M, Bénard É, Pérez N, et al. HPV Vaccination Impact Study Group. Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2019,394(10197):497-509.
[22]
刘婷婷, 孔为民, 胡晓, 等. HPV感染患者焦虑现状及相关影响因素分析[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志,2020,47(2):236-240.
[23]
万建玉, 蔡秋娥, 王淼, 等. 深圳地区女性HIV合并宫颈HPV感染现状调查及临床干预的相关性研究[J]. 中国性科学,2020,29(3):27-31.
[24]
王晓阳, 王静, 韩劼, 孙立元. 两种预处理方法联合光动力治疗肛周尖锐湿疣的疗效观察[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2023,17(3):158-163.
[25]
彭君, 吴华丽. 基于知信行理论的延续性护理在冠心病PCI术后患者中的应用效果观察[J]. 基层医学论坛,2023,27(6):40-42.
[26]
李贝贝. 艾拉光动力疗法治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床疗效研究[D]. 青岛大学,2022.
[27]
翟瑞芳, 贺红霞, 张三元. 艾拉光动力治疗宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒持续感染的临床疗效及安全性研究[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019,19(16):2785-2787.
[1] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[2] 钱雅君, 虞竹溪, 徐颖, 董丹江, 顾勤. 危重型新型冠状病毒感染合并侵袭性肺曲霉病的临床特征和高危因素分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 3-9.
[3] 石皆春, 范子玉, 邢燕. 不同筛查方法预警宫颈原位腺癌的效能[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 575-581.
[4] 郭任博, 邹本奎, 边家盛. 新辅助联合后入路机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术在高危前列腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 540-540.
[5] 李想, 郭征, 田洪哲, 李杜, 熊梦瑶, 潘铁军. 1 470 nm半导体激光减容性切除治疗高危前列腺增生的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 448-452.
[6] 王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 董柏君, 潘家骅, 薛蔚. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 435-440.
[7] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[8] 何仪, 赵延军, 吴盼, 顾兴, 曹钰洁, 邱璐. EMS 管理模式下延续性干预在肺癌合并肺结核中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 145-148.
[9] 沈柳柳, 周不畏, 王敏, 卢春霞, 邢燕飞. 个体化肺康复及情绪调节对AECOPD并VTE 高危患者生活质量和预后影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 971-974.
[10] 刘静, 徐爽, 缪亚军. 肺腺癌miR-3653表达与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染及预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 600-604.
[11] 龙吟, 何晓东, 廖建国, 黄珏, 张磊. 高复发风险肝癌患者术后靶向免疫治疗的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 379-386.
[12] 周帅, 张庆海, 王新, 马晓艳, 孙建霞, 王海波, 张继红. 静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合辅助下溶栓治疗急性高危肺栓塞一例[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 298-302.
[13] 马慧颖, 魏玉梅. 妊娠合并糖尿病酮症酸中毒的诊治[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 223-227.
[14] 宋勇战, 刘宝龙, 王萍, 周登明, 刘永胜. 卵圆孔未闭封堵治疗单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 94-101.
[15] 傅林海, 赵俊俊, 丁剑毅, 杨露萍, 王彬, 魏德胜, 喻光懋. 亚肺叶切除术后迟发性纵隔气肿机制[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 62-66.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?