切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 368 -373. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2021.06.002

流感专题

淋巴细胞亚群在儿童重症甲型流感诊断中的价值
张艳兰1, 徐琳1, 王彩英1, 庞琳1,()   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院儿科,北京市新发传染病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-12 出版日期:2021-12-15
  • 通信作者: 庞琳
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院重点实验室开放课题(No. DTKF201803)

Diagnostic value of lymphocyte subsets in children with severe influenza A

Yanlan Zhang1, Lin Xu1, Caiying Wang1, Lin Pang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory for Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2021-03-12 Published:2021-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Lin Pang
引用本文:

张艳兰, 徐琳, 王彩英, 庞琳. 淋巴细胞亚群在儿童重症甲型流感诊断中的价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 368-373.

Yanlan Zhang, Lin Xu, Caiying Wang, Lin Pang. Diagnostic value of lymphocyte subsets in children with severe influenza A[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 368-373.

目的

探讨重症甲型流感儿童淋巴细胞亚群特点,并评价其在重症甲型流感中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性研究2018年10月至2019年12月首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院收治的病程在48 h以内的甲型流感住院患儿共129例,按照年龄、性别进行1∶2配对,仅有发热、上呼吸道症状者为轻症组(43例);有持续高热> 3 d,合并肺炎、呼吸困难、神志改变等为重症组(86例)。检测两组患儿血常规、淋巴细胞亚群,比较两组患儿上述指标的差异。应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析淋巴细胞亚群在重症甲型流感中的诊断效能,并应用Medcalc软件对各指标曲线下面积(AUC)进行两两比较。

结果

与轻症组相比,重症甲型流感患儿淋巴细胞计数[1 554(928,2 605)个/μl vs. 2 723(1 792,4 108)个/μl]、T细胞计数[728(419,1 491)个/μl vs. 1 558(1 123,2 259)个/μl],CD4+ T细胞计数[418(237,699)个/μl vs. 1558(1 123,2 259)个/μl]均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(Z = -3.959、-2.833、-4.399,P < 0.001、0.005、< 0.001)。CD4+ T细胞计数诊断甲型流感灵敏度和特异度分别为60.4%和95.5%,AUC为0.825(95%CI:0.715~0.905)。CD4+ T细胞计数与CD8+ T细胞计数、NK细胞计数、B细胞计数的AUC差异均有统计学意义(Z = 1.961,2.227,2.602,P = 0.0498、0.026、0.0093),与淋巴细胞计数、T细胞计数AUC差异无统计学意义(Z = 1.016、1.372,P = 0.310、0.17)。

结论

重症甲型流感患儿病程初期存在细胞免疫功能受损,病程48 h内CD4+ T细胞计数对于重症甲型流感有较好的诊断效能。

Objective

To investigate the characteristics of lymphocyte subsets in children with severe influenza A, and to evaluate their diagnostic value for children with severe influenza A.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 129 hospitalized children with influenza A within 48 hours in Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University from October 2018 to December 2019. A 1∶2 match was made according to age and sex. Only those with fever and upper respiratory symptoms were classified as mild group (43 cases); those with persistent high fever > 3 days, and those with pneumonia, dyspnea and altered consciousness were classified as severe group (86 cases). Blood routine examination and lymphocyte subsets of the two groups were detected and compared. The diagnostic efficacy of each parameter of lymphocyte subsets in severe influenza A were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), while the area under the curve (AUC) of each parameter were compared in pairs by Medcalc software.

Results

Lymphocyte count [1 554 (928, 2 605) cells/μl vs. 2 723 (1 792, 4 108) cells/μl] and T cell count [728 (419, 1 491) cells/μl vs. 1 558 (1 123, 2 259) cells/μl], CD4+ T cell count [418 (237, 699) cells/μl vs. 1 558 (1 123, 2 259) cells/μl] decreased, all with significant differences (Z =-3.959, -2.833, -4.399; P < 0.001, 0.005, < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of CD4+ T cell count were 60.4% and 95.5%, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.825 (95%CI: 0.715-0.905). The AUC of CD4+ T cell count compared with that of CD8+ T cell count, NK cell count and B cell count were all with significantly difference (Z = 1.961, 2.227, 2.602; P = 0.0498, 0.026, 0.0093), but without significantly difference compared with lymphocyte count and T cell count (Z = 1.016, 1.372; P = 0.310, 0.17).

Conclusions

The cellular immune function of children with severe influenza A is impaired at early stage of the disease. CD4+ T cell count within 48 hours of the disease has good diagnostic efficacy for severe influenza A.

表1 轻、重症甲型流感儿童白细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数[M(P25,P75)]
表2 轻、重症甲型流感儿童淋巴细胞亚群[M(P25,P75)]
图1 淋巴细胞亚群各参数用于重症甲型流感诊断的ROC曲线
表3 淋巴细胞亚群ROC曲线参数
[1]
祁贤. 公共卫生视角下的流感病毒研究[J]. 医学研究生学报,2018,31(12):1233-1236.
[2]
Echevarría-Zuno S, Mejía-Aranguré JM, Mar-Obeso AJ, et al. Infection and death from influenza A H1N1 virus in Mexico: a retrospective analysis[J]. Lancet,2009,374(9707):2072-2079.
[3]
Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico[J]. N Engl J Med,2009,361(7):680-689.
[4]
唐源, 张光莉, 罗斯颖, 等. 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院甲型流感病毒肺炎患儿617例临床特征及重症危险因素分析[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2019,34(12):1017-1021.
[5]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 国家中医药局.流行性感冒诊疗方案(2019年版)[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志,2019(6):451-455.
[6]
Ijaz M, Khan MJ, Khan J, et al. Association of clinical characteristics of patients presenting with influenza like illness or severe acute respiratory illness with development of acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis,2017,87(1):765.
[7]
徐琳, 张艳兰, 王彩英, 等. 83例重症甲型流行性感冒患儿的临床特征[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2020,14(1):69-72.
[8]
Chan M C W, Cheung C Y, Chui W H, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine responses induced by influenza A (H5N1) viruses in primary human alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells[J]. Respir Res,2005,6:135.
[9]
Pang IK, Iwasaki A. Inflammasomes as mediators of immunity against influenza virus[J]. Trends Immunol,2011,32(1):34-41.
[10]
Rodriguez-Nunez I, Wcisel DJ, Litman GW, et al. Multigene families of Immunoglobulin domain-containing innate immune receptors in zebrafish:deciphering the differences[J]. Dev Comp Immunol,2014,46(1):24-34.
[11]
胡亚美, 江载芳主编. 诸福棠实用儿科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2015,566.
[12]
詹文丽, 杨笑涵, 郭浩, 等. 826例0岁至学龄前健康儿童外周血淋巴细胞亚群分布的调查分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2019,21(2):180-183.
[13]
Kam KM, Leung WL, Wong KH, et al. Maturational changes in peripheral lymphocytes subsets pertinent to monitoring human immuno-deficiency virus-infected Chinses pediatric patients[J]. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol,2001,8(5):926-931.
[14]
肖婧, 申丹, 刘永革, 等. 以流式细胞术建立中国汉族健康儿童外周血淋巴细胞亚群相对计数的正常参考值[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志,2010,5(4):245-250.
[15]
Zhou Jf, Wang DY, Gao RB, et al. Biological features of novel avian influenza A (H7N9) virus[J]. Nature,2013,499(7459):500-503.
[16]
Chi Y, Zhu YF, Wen T, et al. Cytokine and chemokine levels in patients infected with the novel avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in China[J]. J Infect Dis,2013,208(12):1962-1967.
[17]
Huang Y, Zhu W, Zeng X, et al. Innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) pdm09[J]. Arch Virol,2013,158(11):2267-2272.
[18]
储矗, 季伟, 贾颖, 等. 甲型H1N1流感患儿细胞免疫特点分析[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2011,26(3):187-189.
[19]
邓见玲, 陈志宏, 沈红红, 等. 儿童重症甲型H1N1流感淋巴细胞亚群分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2012,23(6):758-759.
[20]
徐晓雪, 王蓓蓓, 宋蕊, 等. 甲型流感病毒感染者CD160+CD8+ T淋巴细胞亚群分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2020,14(3):206-211.
[21]
陈小桥, 林杰, 王静, 等. 2017-2018年冬季流感患儿临床特点和血常规表现[J]. 国际病毒学杂志,2019,26(2):90-92.
[22]
陈威巍, 谢杨新, 张云辉, 等. 甲型H1N1流感患者外周血白细胞和淋巴细胞亚群变化分析[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2010,24(5):331-333.
[23]
徐娟, 颜学兵, 周培培, 等. 甲型H1N1流感危重症患者淋巴细胞亚群和CD4+CD25+调节性T细胞的检测及其意义[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2011,5(1):27-35.
[24]
李亚玲, 刘大凤, 温贤敏, 等. 甲型H1N1流感患者T淋巴细胞亚群动态变化分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2012,6(3):245-248.
[25]
李靖, 屠蒙, 徐喆选, 等. T淋巴细胞亚群对重症甲型流感患者预后的评估价值[J]. 医学研究生学报,2019,32(11):1174-1178.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 邬文莉, 万约翰, 高梓君, 黎凡. 外科手术联合口服西罗莫司治疗儿童口腔颌面部淋巴管畸形[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 345-352.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 闵筱兰, 周洁超, 陈振添. 健康管理联合心理干预用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术患儿术后效果观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 657-661.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要