切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 179 -182. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2018.02.016

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

戊型肝炎患者血清GP73变化特征及意义
蒋煜1, 徐飞2, 胡居龙3, 华文浩2, 李坪3, 魏红山3,()   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院消化科
    2. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-31 出版日期:2018-04-15
  • 通信作者: 魏红山
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 81271901); 北京市自然科学基金(No. 7152073); 首都特色临床研究(No. Z141107002514132); 首都医学发展科研基金(No. 2014-2-2171)

Characteristics of serum GP73 for patients with hepatitis E and its clinical significances

Yu Jiang1, Xu Fei2, Julong Hu3, Wenhao Hua2, Ping Li3, Hongshan Wei3,()   

  1. 2. Clinical Lab, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
    3. Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2017-01-31 Published:2018-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Hongshan Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding auther: Wei Hongshan, Email:
引用本文:

蒋煜, 徐飞, 胡居龙, 华文浩, 李坪, 魏红山. 戊型肝炎患者血清GP73变化特征及意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 179-182.

Yu Jiang, Xu Fei, Julong Hu, Wenhao Hua, Ping Li, Hongshan Wei. Characteristics of serum GP73 for patients with hepatitis E and its clinical significances[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 179-182.

目的

观察戊型肝炎患者血清GP73变化特征。

方法

分析80例健康体检者(对照组)和66例戊型肝炎患者(观察组)血清GP73水平的变化。

结果

对照组研究对象血清GP73水平为(38.82 ± 15.67)ng/ml,观察组患者血清GP73为(80.06 ± 52.33)ng/ml,较对照组显著升高,差异具有统计学意义(t = 6.785、P < 0.00);患者血清GP73水平与丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)活性(r = 0.28、P = 0.015)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)活性(r = 0.36、P = 0.002)总胆红素(TBil)水平(r = 0.47、P < 0.001)均呈正相关,而与凝血酶原活动度(PTA)水平呈负相关(r =-0.329、P = 0.004)。

结论

血清GP73显著升高的人群需考虑急性戊型肝炎病毒感染的可能。戊型肝炎患者的血清GP73水平可能与肝功能损伤程度具有一定的相关性。

Objective

To investigate the variable characteristics of serum GP73 for patients with hepatitis E.

Methods

The changes of GP73 level in serum of 80 healthy subjects (control group) and 66 patients with hepatitis E were detected by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

The median level of serum GP73 for patients with hepatitis E (80.06 ± 52.33 ng/ml) was significantly increased than that of 80 healthy control subjects (38.82 ± 15.67 ng/ml), with significant difference (t = 6.785, P < 0.0001). The level of serum GP73 in patients with hepatitis E had positive correlation with the serum activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (r = 0.28, P = 0.015), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (r = 0.36, P = 0.002) and the level of serum total bilirubin (TBil) (r = 0.47, P < 0.001). While it had negative correlation with the prothrombin time activity (PTA) (r =-0.329, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

The possibility of acute hepatitis E infection should be considered for those who with significangly elevated serum GP73. Serum GP73 levels in patients with hepatitis E may be correlated with liver damage.

图1 两组研究对象血清GP73水平
图2 血清GP73水平与肝功能损伤主要指标的相关性
[1]
Kladney RD, Bulla GA, Guo L, et al. GP73, a novel Golgi-localized protein upregulated by viral infection[J]. Gene,2000,249(1-2):53-65.
[2]
Marrero JA, Romano PR, Nikolaeva O, et al. GP73, a resident Golgi glycoprotein, is a novel serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol,2005,43(6):1007-1012.
[3]
Mao Y, Yang H, Xu H, et al. Golgi protein 73 (GOLPH2) is a valuable serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gut,2010,59(12):1687-1693.
[4]
冯志刚, 岑晓红, 云俊木, 等. GP73在酒精性肝病中的临床意义[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2015,36(15):2214-2215, 2217.
[5]
魏红山, 康艳芳, 郝晓花, 等. 肝细胞脂肪变对血清糖蛋白GP73水平的影响[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2013,27(4):244-247.
[6]
翟庆玲, 刘燃, 王智强, 等. 自身免疫性肝病患者血清GP73变化特征[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2014,28(4):268-271.
[7]
Wei H, Li B, Zhang R, et al. Serum GP73, a marker for evaluating progression in patients with chronic HBV infections[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(2):e53862.
[8]
Hu L, Yao W, Wang F, et al. GP73 is upregulated by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and enhances HCV secretion[J]. PLoS One,2014,9(3):e90553.
[9]
Maitra A, Thuluvath PJ. GP73 and liver disease: a (Golgi) complex enigma[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2004,99(6):1096-1098.
[10]
Ozkan H, Erdal H, Tutkak H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic validity of Golgi protein 73 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Digestion,2011,83(1-2):83-88.
[11]
Wang NY, Wang C, Li W, et al. Prognostic value of serum AFP, AFP-L3, and GP73 in monitoring short-term treatment response and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2014,15(4):1539-1544.
[12]
Özkan H, Erdal H, Tutkak H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic validity of Golgi protein 73 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Digestion,2010,83(1-2):83-88.
[13]
Yamamoto K, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, et al. AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and GP73 as markers for monitoring treatment response and recurrence and as surrogate markers of clinicopathological variables of HCC[J]. J Gastroenterol,2010,45(12):1272-1282.
[14]
Kristiansen G, Fritzsche FR, Wassermann K, et al. GOLPH2 protein expression as a novel tissue biomarker for prostate cancer: implications for tissue-based diagnostics[J]. Br J Cancer,2008,99(6):939-948.
[15]
Zhang F, Gu Y, Li X, et al. Up-regulated Golgi phosphoprotein 2 (GOLPH2) expression in lung adenocarcinoma tissue[J]. Clin Biochem,2010,43(12):983-991.
[16]
Wright LM, Huster D, Lutsenko S, et al. Hepatocyte GP73 expression in Wilson disease[J]. J Hepatol,2009,51(3):557-564.
[17]
Wei H, Hao X, Li B, et al. GP73 is a potential marker for evaluating AIDS progression and antiretroviral therapy efficacy[J]. Mol Biol Rep,2013,40(11):6397-6405.
[18]
Bao YX, Cao Q, Yang Y, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of golgiglycoprotein73 (GP73) with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) related molecules in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[J]. Diagn Pathol,2013,8:197..
[19]
Iftikhar R, Kladney RD, Havlioglu N, et al. Disease- and cell-specific expression of GP73 in human liver disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004,99(6):1087-1095.
[20]
Qiao Y, Chen J, Li X, et al. Serum gp73 is also a biomarker for diagnosing cirrhosis in population with chronic HBV infection[J]. Clin Biochem,2014,47(16-17):216-222.
[21]
Wei H, Zhang J, Li H, et al. GP73, a new marker for diagnosing HBV-ACLF in population with chronic HBV infections[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2014,79(1):19-24.
[22]
Wang F, Li Z, Li L, et al. GP73 was upregulated in PBMC stimulated with ConA but failed to promote lymphocyte proliferation[J]. Cell Biol Int,2015,39(3):334-340.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[6] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[9] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[10] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要