切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2024.01.006

论著

计算机导航辅助胸椎椎弓根置钉后路病灶清除治疗胸椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎
张耀1, 张强1,(), 赵昌松1, 陈佳敏1, 马睿1   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-10 出版日期:2024-02-15
  • 通信作者: 张强
  • 基金资助:
    北京市中西医结合研究所建设项目

Computer navigation-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement in the treatment of thoracic brucellosis spondylitis

Yao Zhang1, Qiang Zhang1,(), Changsong Zhao1, Jiamin Chen1, Rui Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Pathology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2023-08-10 Published:2024-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Qiang Zhang
引用本文:

张耀, 张强, 赵昌松, 陈佳敏, 马睿. 计算机导航辅助胸椎椎弓根置钉后路病灶清除治疗胸椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 35-42.

Yao Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Changsong Zhao, Jiamin Chen, Rui Ma. Computer navigation-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement in the treatment of thoracic brucellosis spondylitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 35-42.

目的

探讨一期后路计算机导航辅助下置入椎弓根螺钉、病灶清除、椎间植骨融合内固定手术治疗胸椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年9月至2019年10月首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院收治的19例胸椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎患者的临床资料,其中男性12例、女性7例,年龄28~66岁,平均年龄(46.8 ± 11.0)岁。入组患者均有胸背部疼痛,13例(68.4%)患者伴有脊髓或神经压迫症状;入组患者均行一期后路计算机导航辅助下置入椎弓根螺钉、病灶清除、椎间植骨融合内固定手术。选择疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C-反应蛋白(CRP)等指标评估手术疗效。

结果

19例患者椎弓根螺钉位置Ⅰ级112枚,置钉准确率93.3%(112/120)。入组患者随访12~36个月,平均(20.9 ± 6.6)个月。19例患者术后胸背部疼痛均明显减轻,功能明显改善。术后2周、术后3个月及末次随访,入组患者VAS评分与术前差异均有统计学意义(P均< 0.001),而末次随访与术后3个月差异无统计学意义(Z =-1.414、P = 0.157)。术后2周,ESR、CRP与术前差异均有统计学意义(P均< 0.001),术后3个月ESR和CRP基本降至正常,且术后3个月及末次随访,ESR、CRP与术前及术后2周差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.001),而末次随访与术后3个月差异均无统计学意义(t = 2.464、P = 0.053,t = 1.711、P = 0.102)。13例伴脊髓或神经压迫症状患者的ASIA分级由术前B级1例,C级2例,D级10例,恢复至末次随访时D级2例,E级11例,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 11.621、P = 0.009)。19例患者均获得骨性融合,无内固定松动、移位等情况发生,均未复发。

结论

计算机导航辅助下手术治疗胸椎布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎具有置入椎弓根置钉准确性高的特点,一期胸椎后路可有效清除病灶组织,改善脊髓神经功能,治愈布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎。

Objectives

To explore the clinical efficacy of one-stage posterior computer navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement, lesion removal, intervertebral bone graft fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of thoracic brucellosis spondylitis.

Methods

From September 2015 to October 2019, 19 patients with thoracic brucellosis spondylitis were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 7 females, aged from 28-66 years (average, 46.8 ± 11.0 years old). All patients had chest and back pain, 13 (68.4%) patients had different degrees of sensory and motor dysfunction, and all the patients underwent one-stage posterior computer navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement, lesion removal, intervertebral bone graft fusion and internal fixation. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are used for clinical efficacy evaluation.

Results

Postoperatively, 112 pedicle screws were located in Grade I, and the accuracy rate of screw placement was 93.3% (112/120). The follow-up was 12-36 months, with an average (20.9 ± 6.6) months. The chest and back pain of all patients was significantly reduced after surgery, and the sensory motor function was significantly improved. At 2 weeks after operation, 3 months after operation and the last follow-up, the VAS score was statistically different from that before operation (all P < 0.001), but there was no statistical difference between the last follow-up and 3 months after operation (Z =-1.414, P = 0.157). At 2 weeks after operation, ESR and CRP were statistically different from those before operation (all P < 0.001). At 3 months after operation, ESR and CRP basically dropped to normal. At 3 months after operation and the last follow-up, ESR and CRP were statistically different from those before and 2 weeks after operation (all P < 0.001), but there was no statistical difference between the last follow-up and 3 months after operation (t = 2.464, P = 0.053; t = 1.711, P = 0.102). The ASIA classification of 13 patients with spinal cord or nerve compression symptoms before the operation was 1 case of grade B, 2 cases of grade C and 10 cases of grade D. At the last follow-up, there were 2 cases of grade D and 11 cases of grade E, with statistical difference (χ2 = 11.621, P = 0.009). In addition, all patients had bone graft fusion at the last follow-up without complications such as recurrence, loosening of internal fixation and displacement.

Conclusions

The treatment of thoracic brucellosis spondylitis with the aid of computer navigation has the characteristics of high accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and can effectively remove the lesion tissue, eliminate chest and back pain, and restore sensory and motor function. The clinical effect is satisfactory.

表2 13例脊髓或神经压迫症状患者手术前后ASIA分级[例(%)]
图1 术中导航实时引导下置入椎弓根螺钉注:A、B:用探针在脊柱后柱点出术前所选定的匹配点进行匹配注册;C~F:在轴位、矢状位、冠状位及三维立体区域选取最佳置钉角度及位置
图2 患者术后病灶组织病理染色和PCR注:A:HE染色可见病灶组织内存在很多不同类型的炎性细胞(× 200);B:Gimesa染色可见布鲁氏菌(× 1 000);C:多重PCR结果显示检测出布鲁氏菌DNA
表1 入组患者手术前后VAS评分、ESR和CRP水平
图3 典型患者手术前后影像学表现注:A、B:术前X线显示T6~7椎间隙变窄,椎体上下缘骨质破坏;C、D:术前CT显示T6~7椎体骨质破坏;E~H:术前MRI显示T6~7椎间盘及临近椎体T1相呈低信号,T2相呈高信号,压脂T2相呈高信号,增强后可见其强化;I、J:术后2周复查可见T6~7椎间隙恢复,螺钉位置满意,内固定牢固;K、L:术后1年复查X线显示螺钉无松动、断裂,内固定牢固,脊柱稳定,椎间骨性融合;M~O:病灶组织修复良好,未见明显异常信号改变
[1]
段毓姣, 陈勇, 孙华丽, 等. 布鲁菌病研究进展[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2018,12(2):105-109.
[2]
Liu X, Zheng M, Jiang Z, et al. Computed tomography imaging characteristics help to differentiate pyogenic spondylitis from brucellar spondylitis[J]. Eur Spine J,2020,29(7):1490-1498.
[3]
Zhou Y, Xie S, Zheng R, et al. Brucellar reproductive system injury: A retrospective study of 22 cases and review of the literature[J]. J Int Med Res,2020,48(6):300060520924548.
[4]
Rizkalla JM, Alhreish K, Syed IY. Spinal brucellosis: A case report and review of the literature [J]. J Orthop Case Rep,2021,11(3):1-5.
[5]
Spiegl UJ, Osterhoff G, Bula P, et al. Biomechanics and clinical outcome after posterior stabilization of mid-thoracic vertebral body fractures: a systematic literature review[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2021,47(5):1389-1398.
[6]
王维霖, 赵永旭, 王琳. 胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入技术治疗胸椎骨折患者的准确性和安全性[J]. 中国医药指南,2020,18(25):97-98.
[7]
齐鹏, 崔赓. 导航系统在脊柱微创手术中应用的研究进展[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志,2018,7(10):767-772.
[8]
刘正蓬, 王雅辉, 明颖. 计算机设计联合3D打印模板应用于脊柱矫形可提升手术精度与矫正效果[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(12):1826-1830.
[9]
钟晖, 陈建明, 张成程, 等. 辅助工具在胸椎椎弓根置钉技术应用的研究进展[J]. 西南国防医药,2019,29(4):510-513.
[10]
Unuvar GK, Kilic AU, Doganay M. Current therapeutic strategy in osteoarticular brucellosis[J]. North Clin Istanb,2019,6(4):415-420.
[11]
陈丽星, 杨新明, 张瑛. 布病脊柱炎的诊断及治疗研究进展[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2020,36(4):57-60.
[12]
Peng Na, Yang Mingzhi, Yin Xinhua, et al. Surgical management for lumbar brucella spondylitis: Posterior versus anterior approaches[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(21):e26076.
[13]
Zhao RG, Ding R, Zhang Q. Safety and efficacy of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in combination with one-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation in lumbar Brucella spondylitis[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2020,199:106259.
[14]
李志琳, 杨成伟, 窦强, 等. 布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎的诊断与治疗(附102例病例报告)[J]. 脊柱外科杂志,2020,18(2):88-92.
[15]
黄智, 辛大奇, 肖宇龙, 等. 后路短节段内固定治疗腰椎布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2021,41(20):1467-1475.
[16]
张凯祥, 孟宪勇, 杨新明, 等. 前路或前后路联合手术治疗颈椎布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2021,31(23):72-78.
[17]
Wu H, Cui Y, Gong L, et al. Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2022,142(22):3643-3649.
[18]
Talu U, Gogus A, Ozturk C, et al. The role of posterior instrumentation and fusion after anterior radical debridement and fusion in the surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis:experience of 127 cases[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19(8):554-559.
[19]
王杰, 张强. 布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎诊断和治疗研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(14):1304-1307.
[20]
Chang MC, Choo YJ, Lee GW. Pedicle screws versus cortical screws in posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Spine J,2021,21(7):1126-1134.
[21]
Chung TT, Chu CL, Hueng DY, et al. A parametric investigation on traditional and cortical bone trajectory screws for transpedicular fixation[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):612.
[22]
杨永竑, 叶虹, 郑杰, 等. 骨科手术导航系统在椎弓根螺钉固定术中的应用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(1):75-76.
[23]
张冬生, 袁金涛, 郑杰, 等. 计算机辅助导航系统引导下的椎弓根螺钉置人术[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(6):544-545, 551.
[24]
杨曦, 孔清泉, 宋跃明, 等. 计算机导航辅助椎弓根螺钉后路固定在骨质疏松患者中的临床应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2012,26(1):196-200.
[25]
李向阳, 雷春芳. 数字化导航模板下胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉内固定术的手术配合[J]. 微创医学,2017,12(1):143-144,150.
[26]
吴登将, 杨进顺, 陈为坚, 等. 计算机导航与C臂透视下颈椎弓根置钉的实验研究[J]. 骨科医学,2018,25(18):64-67.
[27]
张亚峰, 王建伟, 陈文锦, 等. 计算机导航下经Wiltse人路钉棒内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效观察[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究,2018,15(5):27-30.
[28]
钱选昆, 黄合飞, 武成聪, 等. 计算机导航微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎滑脱[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(24):3790-3795.
[29]
秦豪, 黄文华, 杨克勤, 等. 计算机导航技术辅助定位穿刺行经椎间孔入路经皮内窥镜下椎间盘切除术[J]. 脊柱外科杂志,2020,18(5):293-299.
[30]
La Rocca G, Mazzucchi E, Pignotti F, et al. Intraoperative CT-guided navigation versus fluoroscopy for percutaneous pedicle screw placement in 192 patients: a comparative analysis[J]. J Orthop Traumatol,2022,23(1):44.
[31]
Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, et al. Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine[J]. Neurosurgery,2001,48(4):771-778.
[32]
Han W, Gao ZL, Wang JC, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques[J]. Orthopedics,2010,33(8):20704105.
[33]
Kakarla UK, Little AS, Chang SW, et al. Placement of percutaneous thoracic pedicle screws using neuronavigation[J]. World Neurosurg,2010,74(6):606-610.
[34]
Holly LT, Foley KT. Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. Technical note[J]. J Neurosurg,2003,99(3 Suppl):S324-S329.
[35]
Allam Y, Silbermann J, Riese F, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine:comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques[J]. Eur Spine J,2013,22(3):648-653.
[36]
Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, et al. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries[J]. Spine,2007,32(2):E56-E64.
[37]
Jeswani S, Drazin D, Hsieh JC, et al. Instrumenting the small thoracic pedicle:the role of intraoperative computed tomography image-guided surgery[J]. Neurosurgical Focus,2014,36(3):E6.
[1] 刘敏, 孙国文, 唐恩溢. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面外科应用中的新发展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 174-177.
[2] 薛原, 吉晓丽, 温传允, 吴晓晨. 超声下TPVB在NSCLC根治术麻醉中的应用及术后镇痛效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 685-687.
[3] 赵超, 张乾. SAPB和TPVB在腔镜下肺癌根治术中的应用及镇痛效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 535-537.
[4] 李祥魁, 薛玉荣, 丁凯, 孔劲松. ESPB、SAPB、TPVB对胸腔镜微创术血流动力学、应激反应的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 245-247.
[5] 全守波, 曾庆平, 王宇. 胸椎旁神经阻滞联合喉罩全麻在单孔胸腔镜肺癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 770-773.
[6] 彭德良, 李振威, 彭健泓. 胸椎旁神经阻滞复合丙泊酚麻醉对老年开胸术围手术期的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 228-230.
[7] 张健, 林西青. 急诊手术对胸腰椎骨折伴脊髓神经损伤患者神经功能的改善作用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 214-217.
[8] 王耀华, 魏建全. 胸椎结核患者脊髓损伤后手术时机的选择及其对疗效的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 92-96.
[9] 武孝刚, 王金标, 袁杰, 张永明. 急性化脓性胸椎硬脊膜外脓肿伴脊髓受压一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 186-187.
[10] 刘浩, 王娟, 段梦莲, 李伟, 倪红斌, 杭春华. 术中超声在胸椎管髓内肿瘤手术中的应用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 268-272.
阅读次数
全文


摘要