切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 496 -500. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2020.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

动脉血乳酸监测对医院获得性肺炎预后的判断价值
张玉江1, 张巧1, 马千里1, 任之栋1, 王长征1,()   
  1. 1. 400037 重庆,陆军军医大学新桥医院呼吸内科、全军呼吸内科研究所
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2020-12-25
  • 通信作者: 王长征

Value of arterial lactate monitoring on prognosis of hospital acquired pneumonia

Yujiang Zhang1, Qiao Zhang1, Qianli Ma1, Zhidong Ren1, Changzheng Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Respiratory, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2019-12-10 Published:2020-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Changzheng Wang
引用本文:

张玉江, 张巧, 马千里, 任之栋, 王长征. 动脉血乳酸监测对医院获得性肺炎预后的判断价值[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 496-500.

Yujiang Zhang, Qiao Zhang, Qianli Ma, Zhidong Ren, Changzheng Wang. Value of arterial lactate monitoring on prognosis of hospital acquired pneumonia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 496-500.

目的

探讨动脉血乳酸监测对医院获得性肺炎(HAP)患者30 d预后的判断价值。

方法

回顾性分析陆军军医大学新桥医院2016年1月至2017年12月连续收治的71例HAP患者的病例资料,收集患者诊断为HAP后连续5 d的动脉血乳酸资料,以患者诊断为HAP后首个24 h各项指标参数行肺炎严重指数(PSI)评分,入组患者按照诊断为HAP后30 d内是否存活分为存活组(32例)和死亡组(39例)。采用重复度量分析不同预后患者乳酸值、乳酸清除量、乳酸清除率随时间的变化趋势;采用ROC曲线比较乳酸值、乳酸清除量和乳酸清除率对HAP患者30 d预后的判断价值;根据5 d内乳酸峰值分为< 2.0 mmol/L组、≥ 2.0 mmol/L组和≥ 4.0 mmol/L组,比较不同乳酸峰值患者的病死率;采用双变量线性相关性分析乳酸峰值与PSI评分的相关性。

结果

存活组患者乳酸值随时间延长而降低,乳酸清除量、乳酸清除率随时间延长而增加;死亡组患者乳酸值随时间延长而增加,乳酸清除量、乳酸清除率随时间延长而降低。ROC曲线表明诊断为HAP后的动脉乳酸值可用来判断30 d预后,乳酸清除量、乳酸清除率则不能判断30 d预后,诊断HAP后第1天、第2天、第3天、第4天、第5天内乳酸峰值ROC曲线下面积分别为0.67、0.71、0.77、0.71、0.70和0.74。乳酸峰值< 2.0 mmol/L组、≥ 2.0 mmol/L组和≥ 4.0 mmol/L组患者30 d病死率为20.00%、64.29%和78.95%,三组差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 13.27、P = 0.00)。乳酸峰值与PSI评分密切相关(r = 0.41、P = 0.00)。

结论

不同预后HAP患者5 d内动脉乳酸值变化不同;乳酸值比乳酸清除量、乳酸清除率更适于评价预后;乳酸峰值越高,死亡风险越大,与PSI评分密切相关。

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of arterial lactate monitoring in predicting the prognosis of hospital acquired pneumoni (HAP) for 30 days.

Methods

The clinical data of 71 consecutive patients diagnosed as HAP admitted in Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed, retrospectively. The arterial lactate data were collected for consecutive 5 days after diagnosis as HAP, while the pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was taken as the first 24 hours’ physiological parameters after diagnosis. According to the prognosis of survival within 30 days after diagnosis as HAP, the patients were divided into survival group (32 cases) and death group (39 cases). The change trend of arterial lactate, lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate were analyzed by repeated metric analysis. The effect of arterial lactate, lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate on the 30 days prognosis of HAP were compared by ROC curve. The difference in the mortality rates were compared according to the lactate peak within 5 days, which were divided into < 2.0 mmol/L, ≥ 2.0 mmol/L and ≥ 4.0 mmol/L groups; the correlation between lactate peak and PSI score was calculated by double variable linear correlation analysis.

Results

In survival group, as time going on the lactate decreased, lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate increased; in death group, as time going on the lactate increased, lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate decreased. ROC curve showed that lactate could be used to evaluate the prognosis, but not the lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate. The areas under lactate ROC curve of the first day, second day, third day, fourth day, fifith day, the lactate peak within 5 days were 0.67, 0.71, 0.77, 0.71, 0.70 and 0.74, respectively. The mortality rates of the peak value of lactate within 5 days, cases in < 2.0 mmol/L group, ≥ 2.0 mmol/L group and ≥ 4.0 mmol/L group were 20.00%, 64.29% and 78.95%, respectively, with significant difference (χ2 = 13.27, P = 0.00). There was a close correlation between the lactate peak and the PSI score (r = 0.41, P = 0.00).

Conclusions

The changes of arterial lactate were different for different prognosis of HAP patients. The value of arterial lactate was higher than that of lactate clearance and lactate clearance rate for evaluating HAP prognosis. The higher the arterial lactate, the greater risk of death. Arterial lactate peak was closely related to PSI score.

表1 71例HAP患者的一般资料
图1 乳酸值、乳酸清除量和乳酸清除率随时间的变化
图2 乳酸值、乳酸清除量和乳酸清除率ROC曲线图
表2 乳酸值、乳酸清除量和乳酸清除率ROC曲线下面积
图3 乳酸峰值和PSI评分散点图
表2 乳酸峰值与PSI评分相关性分析
[1]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组. 中国成人医院获得性肺炎与呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(4):255-260.
[2]
张玉江,张巧,任之栋, 等. PSI, APACHEⅡ和SOFA三种评分对医院获性肺炎预后的评估价值[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志,2019,12(3):285-288.
[3]
Demirel B. Lactate levels and pneumonia severity index are good predictors of in-hospital mortality in pneumonia[J]. Clin Respir,2018,12(3):991-995.
[4]
Mizock BA, Falk JL. Lactic acidosis in critical illness[J]. Crit Care Med,1992,20(1):80-93.
[5]
Gladden LB. Lactate metabolism--a new paradigm for the third millennium[J]. Physiol,2004,558(Pt1):5-30.
[6]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 医院获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(草案)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,1999,22(4):201-202.
[7]
Cohen RD, Simpson R. Lactate metabolism[J]. Anesthesiology, 1975,43(6):661-673.
[8]
Levy B. Lactate and shock state: the metabolic view[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care,2006,12(4):315-321.
[9]
陈德权,衣雪洁,张东军, 等. 乒乓球运动中的能量代谢特点与供能系统的评定[J].南京体育学院学报(自然科学版),2015,14(1):16-21.
[10]
严翊,谢敏豪. 大鼠游泳运动的最大乳酸稳态负荷的确定-乳酸最小试验[J]. 北京体育大学学报,2010,33(9):43-45.
[11]
Cairns SP. Lactic acid and exercise performance:culprit or friend?[J]. Sports Med,2006,36(4):279-291.
[12]
Iscra F, Gullo A, Biolo G. Bench-to-bedside review: lactate and the lung[J]. Crit Care2002,6(4):327-329.
[13]
Scherer JJ. Chemische und mikroskopische untersuchungen zur pathologie angestellt an den kliniken des julius-hospitales zu Würzburg[M]. Heidelberg.1843.
[14]
中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中国研究型医院学会休克与脓毒症专业委员会. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J]. 临床急诊杂志,2018,19(9):567-588.
[15]
陈敏,朱日进,陈锋, 等. 动脉血乳酸值及乳酸清除率对急性中毒预后影响分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,36(26):3906-3908.
[16]
Frenzen FS, Kutschan U, Meiswinkel N, et al. Admission lactate predicts poor prognosis independently of the CRB/CURB-65 scores in community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2018,24(3):306e1-306e6.
[17]
杨日焰,陈杏波,刘汉冕, 等. 重症肺炎液体复苏患者乳酸清除率,氧合指数与预后相关性研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(12):1149-1151.
[18]
Ferguson BS, Rogatzki MJ, Goodwin ML, et al. Lactate metabolism: historical context, prior misinterpretations, and current understanding[J]. Eur J Appl Physiol,2018,118(4):691-728.
[19]
Aduen J, Bernstein WK, Khastgir T, et al. The use and clinical importance of a substrate-specific electrode for rapid determination of blood lactate concentrations[J]. JAMA,1994,272(21):1678-1685.
[20]
Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Bakker J. Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: a systematic health technology assessment[J]. Crit Care Med,2009,37(10):2827-2839.
[21]
Stacpoole PW, Wright EC, Baumgartner TG, et al.A controlled clinical trial of dichloroacetate for treatment of lactic acidosis in adults. The dichloroacetate-lactic acidosis study group[J]. N Engl J Med,1992,327(22):1564-1569.
[22]
Stacpoole PW, Harman EM, Curry SH, et al. Treatment of lactic acidosis with dichloroacetate[J]. N Engl J Med,1983,309(7):390-396.
[23]
Street D, Bangsbo J, Juel C. Interstitial pH in human skeletal muscle during and after dynamic graded exercise[J]. Physiol, 2001,537(3):993-998.
[24]
Kowalchuk JM, Heigenhauser GJF, Jones NL. Effect of pH on metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses during progressive exercise[J]. Appl Physiol,1984,57(5):1558-1563.
[25]
Darques JL, Decherchi P, Jammes Y. Mechanisms of fatigue-induced activation of group IV afferents: the roles played by lactic acid and inflammatory mediators[J]. Neurosci Lett1998,257(2):109-112.
[26]
田焕焕,韩沙沙,吕长俊, 等. 早期目标乳酸清除率对肺部感染致脓毒症休克治疗的作用[J]. 中国危重病急救医学,2012,24(1):42-45.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要