切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 459 -465. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2018.05.008

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎120例临床研究
费晓1,(), 方凯2   
  1. 1. 262500 青州市,潍坊市益都中心医院感染科
    2. 262500 青州市,青州市人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-27 出版日期:2018-10-15
  • 通信作者: 费晓
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理局培育计划(No. PX2016019)

Clinical study on 120 cases of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis

Xiao Fei1,(), Kai Fang2   

  1. 1. Infectious Diseases Department, Weifang Yidu Central Hospital Contagion Section, Qingzhou 262500, China
    2. Neurology Department, Qingzhou People’s Hospital, Qingzhou 262500, China
  • Received:2018-02-27 Published:2018-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiao Fei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fei Xiao, Email:
引用本文:

费晓, 方凯. 布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎120例临床研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 459-465.

Xiao Fei, Kai Fang. Clinical study on 120 cases of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 459-465.

目的

研究布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎的临床表现、治疗及预后。

方法

分析潍坊市益都中心医院2013年1月至2016年5月收治的120例布鲁菌病并脊柱炎患者的临床资料,其中椎体炎患者35例、椎间盘受累患者55例、骨质破坏患者和脓肿患者各15例,椎体炎患者用药方案为多西环素+利福平(DR组),椎间盘受累组患者治疗方案为多西环素+利福平+复方磺胺新诺明(DRC组);骨质破坏和脓肿患者治疗方案为多西环素+利福平+复方磺胺新诺明+左氧氟沙星(DRCL组),记录各组临床资料及其治疗方案、疗效、复发及药物不良反应等。

结果

入组患者脊柱核磁表现为椎体炎、椎间盘受累、骨质破坏周围软组织脓肿。DR组患者2个疗程治愈率、4个疗程治愈率、超过4个疗程治愈率、复发率、药物不良反应发生率分别为14.3%、82.9%、17.1%、28.6%和5.7%;DRC组患者分别为38.2%、94.5%、5.5%、5.5%和1.8%;DRCL组患者分别为0%、20%、80%、0%和3.33%。2个疗程后DRC组患者治愈率显著高于DR组(χ2= 18.26、P <0.001),4个疗程后DRCL组患者治愈率显著低于DR组和DRC组(P均<0.001);4个以上疗程后DRCL组患者治愈率显著高于其他两组(P均<0.001)。DRCL组患者复发率显著低于其他两组(χ2= 16.692、P <0.001);三组患者药物不良反应差异无统计学意义(χ2= 1.008、P= 0.604)。

结论

多药联合长疗程治疗布鲁杆菌病脊柱炎复发率低,可达到理想治疗终点,且不一定增加药物不良反应的发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical manifestation, treatment and prognosis of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with brucellosis and spondylitis treated in Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang from January 2013 to May 2016 were analyzed, including 35 patients with spondylitis, 55 patients with disc involvement, 15 patients with bone destruction and 15 patients with abscess. Patients with spondylitis were treated with doxycycline and rifampicin (DR group) and patients with disc involvement with doxycycline + rifampicin + compound sulfampin plus cotrimoxazole (DRC group), patients with bone destruction and abscess were treated with doxycycline + rifamp Ping + compound sulfamethoxazole +levofloxacin (DRCL group). The clinical data, therapeutic effects, recurrence and adverse drug reactions were recorded, respectively.

Results

The spinal nuclear magnetic fields of the patients presented with spondylitis, disc involvement and soft tissue abscess around bone destruction. The cure rates of 2 courses, 4 courses, longer than 4 courses of treatment, the recurrence rate and adverse drug reaction rate of patients in DR group were 14.3%, 82.9%, 17.1%, 28.6% and 5.7%, respectively; which were 38.2%, 94.5%, 5.5%, 5.5% and 1.8% of patients in DRC group; and 0%, 20%, 80%, 0% and 3.33% of patients in DRCL group, respectively. After two courses of treatment, the cure rate of DRC group was significantly higher than that of DR group (χ2= 18.26,P< 0.001). After 4 courses of treatment, the cure rate in DRCL group was significantly lower than that of DR group and DRC group (allP< 0.001), the cure rate of DRCL group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups after longer than 4 courses of treatment (allP< 0.001). The recurrence rate in DRCL group was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (χ2= 16.692,P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in adverse drug reactions among the three groups (χ2= 1.008,P= 0.604).

Conclusions

The relapse rate of multiple drugs combined with long course of treatment for spondylitis of brucellosis is low, which could reach the ideal end point, and does not necessarily increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

表1 120例布鲁菌病并椎体感染者的临床表现
图1 L1椎体T1和T2序列信号增高
图2 椎体及椎间盘受损
图3 椎体部分骨质呈虫噬样破坏
图4 颈椎椎旁脓肿
图5 某例患者治疗前脊柱核磁检查
图6 某例典型患者治疗10个月后复查脊柱核磁检查
图7 某例典型患者治疗结束后复查核磁
表2 不同治疗方案患者的治愈率、复发率和不良反应率[例(%)]
[1]
王书芳. 344例布氏杆菌病临床特点分析[D].银川:宁夏医科大学,2016.
[2]
白永飞,崔步云,帖萍,等. 2006-2015年山西省布鲁氏菌病疫情分析[J].传染病监测,2016,31(12):1018-1021.
[3]
朱素萍.人和动物布氏杆菌病疫情时空趋势分析及其相关性研究[D].兰州:西北民族大学,2013.
[4]
徐卫民,朱素娟,施旭光,等.浙江省布鲁氏菌病疫情分析与防制对策研究[J].浙江预防医学,2016,28(6):578-582.
[5]
赵锁花,杨建德.人感染布氏杆菌病的风险因素分析[J].天津农学院学报,2017,24(3):97-98, 101.
[6]
弓建国,许文联.布鲁菌性脊椎炎误诊为脊椎结核的CT对比分析[J].当代医学,2009,15(36):39-40.
[7]
吴广.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的CT及MRI诊断[J].内蒙古中医药,2014,33(36):67.
[8]
张培楠,杨新明,孟宪勇,等.布氏杆菌病性脊椎炎的影像学分型[J].河北医科大学学报,2015,36(3):334-337.
[9]
Alyousef M, Aldoghaither R. First case of cervical epidural abscess caused by brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A case report and literature review. ID Cases. 2018 Apr 11; 12:107-111.
[10]
刘涛,孙建民,崔新刚,等. MRI及病理学鉴别早期化脓性脊柱炎及布氏杆菌脊柱炎中的应用及价值[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(4):499-504.
[11]
Solera J, Lozano E, Elisa Martnez-Alfaro, et al. Brucellar spondylitis: review of 35 cases and literature survey[J]. Clin Infect Dise,1999,29(6):1440-1449.
[12]
孟祥珠.布氏杆菌病183例临床分析[D].山东大学,2017.
[13]
中华人民共和国卫生部.布鲁氏菌病诊疗指南(试行) [EB/OL]. [2012-10]

URL    
[14]
唐丽丽,刘白鹭,舒圣捷,等.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的影像学诊断[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(06):414-416.
[15]
沈娟,韩炜,冯旭霞.布氏杆菌脊柱炎的磁共振成像诊断及临床价值研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2016,26(17):98-101.
[16]
李奎,张丽丽.布氏杆菌性脊柱炎15例影像分析[J].中国实用医药,2014,9(9):93-94.
[17]
郑久荣.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的CT诊断[J].医疗装备,2017,30(6):132-133.
[18]
孙长青,李天金,马建青.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎分型及其影像学表现分析[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2016,14(9):124-126.
[19]
沈士恒,王清涛,张丽娜,等.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎影像与临床分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(26):21-22, 24.
[20]
World Health Organization. Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on brucellosis[J]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser,1986,740:1-132.
[21]
王大力,张士义.急性期布氏病治疗进展研究[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2001,16(2):94-95.
[22]
Yang XM, Shi W, Meng XY, et al.The Assessment of the clinical effect of the drug compatibility and course of treatment to the brucellar spondylitis[J].Surgical Science,2013,4(1):92-99.
[23]
Ioannou S, Karadima D, Pneumaticos S, et al. Efficacy ofprolonged antimicrobial chemotherapy for brucellar spondylodiskitis[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2011,17(5):756-762.
[24]
Yilmaz E, Parlak M, Akalin H, et al. Brucellar spondylitis: review of 25 cases[J]. J Clin Rheumatol,2004,10(6):300-307.
[25]
章鹏,杨新明,孟宪勇.布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎的诊断和治疗进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂,2013,23(11):1029-1032.
[1] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[2] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[3] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[4] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[5] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[6] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[7] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[8] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[9] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[10] 吴晨瑞, 廖锐, 贺强, 潘龙, 黄平, 曹洪祥, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄俊杰, 孙睿锐. MDT模式下肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗肝细胞癌多处转移一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 713-716.
[11] 辛彩焕, 熊辉. 非疫区36例布鲁菌病患者的临床特征及诊疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 927-931.
[12] 陆志峰, 周佳佳, 梁舒. 虚拟现实技术在治疗弱视中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 891-895.
[13] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要