切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 459 -465. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2018.05.008

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎120例临床研究
费晓1,(), 方凯2   
  1. 1. 262500 青州市,潍坊市益都中心医院感染科
    2. 262500 青州市,青州市人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-27 出版日期:2018-10-15
  • 通信作者: 费晓
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理局培育计划(No. PX2016019)

Clinical study on 120 cases of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis

Xiao Fei1,(), Kai Fang2   

  1. 1. Infectious Diseases Department, Weifang Yidu Central Hospital Contagion Section, Qingzhou 262500, China
    2. Neurology Department, Qingzhou People’s Hospital, Qingzhou 262500, China
  • Received:2018-02-27 Published:2018-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiao Fei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fei Xiao, Email:
引用本文:

费晓, 方凯. 布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎120例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 459-465.

Xiao Fei, Kai Fang. Clinical study on 120 cases of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 459-465.

目的

研究布鲁菌病合并脊柱炎的临床表现、治疗及预后。

方法

分析潍坊市益都中心医院2013年1月至2016年5月收治的120例布鲁菌病并脊柱炎患者的临床资料,其中椎体炎患者35例、椎间盘受累患者55例、骨质破坏患者和脓肿患者各15例,椎体炎患者用药方案为多西环素+利福平(DR组),椎间盘受累组患者治疗方案为多西环素+利福平+复方磺胺新诺明(DRC组);骨质破坏和脓肿患者治疗方案为多西环素+利福平+复方磺胺新诺明+左氧氟沙星(DRCL组),记录各组临床资料及其治疗方案、疗效、复发及药物不良反应等。

结果

入组患者脊柱核磁表现为椎体炎、椎间盘受累、骨质破坏周围软组织脓肿。DR组患者2个疗程治愈率、4个疗程治愈率、超过4个疗程治愈率、复发率、药物不良反应发生率分别为14.3%、82.9%、17.1%、28.6%和5.7%;DRC组患者分别为38.2%、94.5%、5.5%、5.5%和1.8%;DRCL组患者分别为0%、20%、80%、0%和3.33%。2个疗程后DRC组患者治愈率显著高于DR组(χ2= 18.26、P <0.001),4个疗程后DRCL组患者治愈率显著低于DR组和DRC组(P均<0.001);4个以上疗程后DRCL组患者治愈率显著高于其他两组(P均<0.001)。DRCL组患者复发率显著低于其他两组(χ2= 16.692、P <0.001);三组患者药物不良反应差异无统计学意义(χ2= 1.008、P= 0.604)。

结论

多药联合长疗程治疗布鲁杆菌病脊柱炎复发率低,可达到理想治疗终点,且不一定增加药物不良反应的发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical manifestation, treatment and prognosis of brucellosis complicated with spondylitis.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with brucellosis and spondylitis treated in Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang from January 2013 to May 2016 were analyzed, including 35 patients with spondylitis, 55 patients with disc involvement, 15 patients with bone destruction and 15 patients with abscess. Patients with spondylitis were treated with doxycycline and rifampicin (DR group) and patients with disc involvement with doxycycline + rifampicin + compound sulfampin plus cotrimoxazole (DRC group), patients with bone destruction and abscess were treated with doxycycline + rifamp Ping + compound sulfamethoxazole +levofloxacin (DRCL group). The clinical data, therapeutic effects, recurrence and adverse drug reactions were recorded, respectively.

Results

The spinal nuclear magnetic fields of the patients presented with spondylitis, disc involvement and soft tissue abscess around bone destruction. The cure rates of 2 courses, 4 courses, longer than 4 courses of treatment, the recurrence rate and adverse drug reaction rate of patients in DR group were 14.3%, 82.9%, 17.1%, 28.6% and 5.7%, respectively; which were 38.2%, 94.5%, 5.5%, 5.5% and 1.8% of patients in DRC group; and 0%, 20%, 80%, 0% and 3.33% of patients in DRCL group, respectively. After two courses of treatment, the cure rate of DRC group was significantly higher than that of DR group (χ2= 18.26,P< 0.001). After 4 courses of treatment, the cure rate in DRCL group was significantly lower than that of DR group and DRC group (allP< 0.001), the cure rate of DRCL group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups after longer than 4 courses of treatment (allP< 0.001). The recurrence rate in DRCL group was significantly lower than that of the other two groups (χ2= 16.692,P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in adverse drug reactions among the three groups (χ2= 1.008,P= 0.604).

Conclusions

The relapse rate of multiple drugs combined with long course of treatment for spondylitis of brucellosis is low, which could reach the ideal end point, and does not necessarily increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

表1 120例布鲁菌病并椎体感染者的临床表现
图1 L1椎体T1和T2序列信号增高
图2 椎体及椎间盘受损
图3 椎体部分骨质呈虫噬样破坏
图4 颈椎椎旁脓肿
图5 某例患者治疗前脊柱核磁检查
图6 某例典型患者治疗10个月后复查脊柱核磁检查
图7 某例典型患者治疗结束后复查核磁
表2 不同治疗方案患者的治愈率、复发率和不良反应率[例(%)]
[1]
王书芳. 344例布氏杆菌病临床特点分析[D].银川:宁夏医科大学,2016.
[2]
白永飞,崔步云,帖萍,等. 2006-2015年山西省布鲁氏菌病疫情分析[J].传染病监测,2016,31(12):1018-1021.
[3]
朱素萍.人和动物布氏杆菌病疫情时空趋势分析及其相关性研究[D].兰州:西北民族大学,2013.
[4]
徐卫民,朱素娟,施旭光,等.浙江省布鲁氏菌病疫情分析与防制对策研究[J].浙江预防医学,2016,28(6):578-582.
[5]
赵锁花,杨建德.人感染布氏杆菌病的风险因素分析[J].天津农学院学报,2017,24(3):97-98, 101.
[6]
弓建国,许文联.布鲁菌性脊椎炎误诊为脊椎结核的CT对比分析[J].当代医学,2009,15(36):39-40.
[7]
吴广.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的CT及MRI诊断[J].内蒙古中医药,2014,33(36):67.
[8]
张培楠,杨新明,孟宪勇,等.布氏杆菌病性脊椎炎的影像学分型[J].河北医科大学学报,2015,36(3):334-337.
[9]
Alyousef M, Aldoghaither R. First case of cervical epidural abscess caused by brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A case report and literature review. ID Cases. 2018 Apr 11; 12:107-111.
[10]
刘涛,孙建民,崔新刚,等. MRI及病理学鉴别早期化脓性脊柱炎及布氏杆菌脊柱炎中的应用及价值[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(4):499-504.
[11]
Solera J, Lozano E, Elisa Martnez-Alfaro, et al. Brucellar spondylitis: review of 35 cases and literature survey[J]. Clin Infect Dise,1999,29(6):1440-1449.
[12]
孟祥珠.布氏杆菌病183例临床分析[D].山东大学,2017.
[13]
中华人民共和国卫生部.布鲁氏菌病诊疗指南(试行) [EB/OL]. [2012-10]

URL    
[14]
唐丽丽,刘白鹭,舒圣捷,等.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的影像学诊断[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(06):414-416.
[15]
沈娟,韩炜,冯旭霞.布氏杆菌脊柱炎的磁共振成像诊断及临床价值研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2016,26(17):98-101.
[16]
李奎,张丽丽.布氏杆菌性脊柱炎15例影像分析[J].中国实用医药,2014,9(9):93-94.
[17]
郑久荣.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎的CT诊断[J].医疗装备,2017,30(6):132-133.
[18]
孙长青,李天金,马建青.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎分型及其影像学表现分析[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2016,14(9):124-126.
[19]
沈士恒,王清涛,张丽娜,等.布氏杆菌病性脊柱炎影像与临床分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(26):21-22, 24.
[20]
World Health Organization. Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on brucellosis[J]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser,1986,740:1-132.
[21]
王大力,张士义.急性期布氏病治疗进展研究[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2001,16(2):94-95.
[22]
Yang XM, Shi W, Meng XY, et al.The Assessment of the clinical effect of the drug compatibility and course of treatment to the brucellar spondylitis[J].Surgical Science,2013,4(1):92-99.
[23]
Ioannou S, Karadima D, Pneumaticos S, et al. Efficacy ofprolonged antimicrobial chemotherapy for brucellar spondylodiskitis[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2011,17(5):756-762.
[24]
Yilmaz E, Parlak M, Akalin H, et al. Brucellar spondylitis: review of 25 cases[J]. J Clin Rheumatol,2004,10(6):300-307.
[25]
章鹏,杨新明,孟宪勇.布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎的诊断和治疗进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂,2013,23(11):1029-1032.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[3] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[6] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[7] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[8] 袁园园, 岳乐淇, 张华兴, 武艳, 李全海. 间充质干细胞在呼吸系统疾病模型中肺组织分布及治疗机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 374-381.
[9] 国文凯, 纪鹏程, 毕靖茹, 谢院生. IgA 肾病的十种治疗措施[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 327-333.
[10] 帖璇, 苏晓乐, 王利华. 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 345-351.
[11] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[12] 马豆豆, 丁艳, 古今, 王丽芳, 石连杰. 以发热为首发表现的强直性脊柱炎合并潜伏性结核感染一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 791-794.
[13] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
阅读次数
全文


摘要