切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 545 -549. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2017.06.005

临床论著

直接抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效观察
程丹颖1, 刘晓民1, 欧蔚妮1, 庄立伟1, 邢卉春1,(), 成军1   
  1. 1. 100015 北京,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院肝病中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-20 出版日期:2017-12-15
  • 通信作者: 邢卉春
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会肝病医学部肝硬化门脉高压并发症科研项目(No. LDWJPMF-MMGY-2016002); 北京市中医药科技项目(No. JJ2014-25); 北京市医管局项目(No. DFL2015170,No. ZYLX201402)

Clinical efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis

Danying Cheng1, Xiaomin Liu1, Weini Ou1, Liwei Zhuang1, Huichun Xing1,(), Jun Cheng1   

  1. 1. Hepatology Diseases Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2016-12-20 Published:2017-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Huichun Xing
引用本文:

程丹颖, 刘晓民, 欧蔚妮, 庄立伟, 邢卉春, 成军. 直接抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效观察[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(06): 545-549.

Danying Cheng, Xiaomin Liu, Weini Ou, Liwei Zhuang, Huichun Xing, Jun Cheng. Clinical efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(06): 545-549.

目的

观察直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年1月于本院就诊并使用DAAs抗病毒治疗的丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的临床特点及治疗方案,观察治疗过程中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA、肝功能、安全性指标及不良反应。

结果

24例患者中,男性10例,女性14例,年龄43~77岁,平均年龄为(56.38 ± 8.99)岁,代偿期、失代偿期肝硬化各12例,干扰素经治患者(停药复发/干扰素不耐受)18例。HCV RNA基因分型1b型20例,2a型2例,3b型2例,HCV RNA载量为1.63 × 103~2.72 × 107 IU/ml。治疗方案为索非布韦(SOF)+达卡他韦(DCV)+利巴韦林(RBV)患者4例、SOF + DCV治疗患者6例、SOF +雷迪帕韦(LDV)+ RBV治疗患者5例、SOF + LDV治疗患者7例、SOF + RBV治疗患者2例。除1例失代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化患者在治疗过程中因消化道出血死亡外,其余23例患者均完成了治疗,并且均已停药随访24周以上,所有患者均获得快速病毒学应答(RVR)、治疗结束时病毒学应答(ETVR),22例(95.65%)患者获得持续病毒学应答(SVR)。抗病毒治疗后肝功能改善,丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)下降(t = 4.90,P < 0.001),天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)下降(t = 4.24,P < 0.001),胆碱酯酶(CHE)升高(t = 2.30,P = 0.03),甲胎蛋白(AFP)下降(Z = 2.43,P = 0.02),Child-Pugh评分下降(Z = 2.06,P = 0.04);肾功能无减退。不良反应主要表现为乏力者5例、头晕者2例、头痛者1例、发热者1例、腹泻者1例、皮疹者2例,以上不适症状均为一过性,自行缓解,不影响治疗。

结论

DAAs治疗我国丙型肝炎肝硬化患者疗效和安全性良好;对失代偿期肝硬化的远期疗效待观察。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver cirrhosis.

Methods

The clinical characteristics and treatment protocols of patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were analyzed by descriptive method. HCV RNA, liver function, safety and adverse reactions were observed during treatment, respectively.

Results

Total of 24 cases including 10 male and 14 female were collected. The patients were aged 43-77 years old, and the mean age was (56.38 ± 8.99) years old. There were 12 cases with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively. There were 18 patients with interferon via treated (recurrence of drug withdrawal or could not tolerate). There were 20 cases with genotype 1b, 2 cases with genotype 2a and 2 cases with genotype 3b. HCV RNA ranged from 1.63 × 103 to 2.72 × 107IU/m1. All patients were treated with DAAs, among whom 4 were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF) + daclatasvir (DCV) + ribavirin (RBV), 6 patients treated with SOF + DCV, 5 patients treated with SOF + ledipasvir (LDV) + RBV, 7 patients treated with SOF + LDV, and 2 patients treated with SOF + RBV. There were 23 patients who completed the treatment and followed for 24 weeks after drug withdrawal while one patient was died of gastrointestinal bleeding during the treatment. All patients achieved rapid virological response (RVR) and end treatment virological response (ETVR). There were 22 (95.65%) patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). Liver function were improved after treatment with decreased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (t = 4.90, P < 0.001) and aspartate amino transferase (AST) (t = 4.24, P < 0.001). While cholinesterase (CHE) was increased (t = 2.30, P = 0.03), alphafetoprotein (AFP) (Z = 2.43, P = 0.02) and Child-Pugh score (Z = 2.06, P = 0.04) were decreased, with significant differences. No significant change of renal function was found. Only slight adverse reactions such as fatigue (5 patients), dizziness (2 patients), headache (1 patient), fever (1 patient), diarrhea (1 patient) and skin rash (2 patients) were observed during treatment. These discomforts were transient and alleviated by oneself, which not affected the treatment.

Conclusions

DAAs were effective and safe in treatment of patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. The long-term therapeutic efficacy need to be furtherly evaluated for decompensated liver cirrhosis.

表1 抗病毒治疗前后入组患者的指标水平
[1]
中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 丙型肝炎防治指南(2015年更新版)[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2015,9(5):590-607.
[2]
Te HS, Jensen DM. Epidemiology of hepatitis B and C viruses: a global overview[J]. Clin Liver Dis,2010,14(1):1-21.
[3]
于国英, 黄群, 马玉秀. 慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(4):626-629.
[4]
张霞霞, 徐小元. 小分子化合物抗病毒治疗丙型肝炎肝硬化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2016,19(4):398-400.
[5]
Maan R, van der Meer AJ, Hansen BE, et al. Effect of thrombocytopenia on treatment tolerability and outcome in patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced hepatic fibrosis[J]. J Hepatol,2014,6l(3):482-491.
[6]
Ji F, Zhang S, Deng H, et al. Efficacy of interferon-based antiviral therapy on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma of patients with chronic hepatitis C: further evidence in decompensation cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol,2013,58(6):1262-1264.
[7]
Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Kajiwara E, et al. Efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin treatment on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a prospective, multicenter study [J]. J Hepatol,2013,58(3):495-501.
[8]
Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection[J]. N Engl J Med,2002,347(13):975-982.
[9]
慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗专家委员会. 慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗专家共识[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2009,3(3):343-352.
[10]
Poordad F, McCone J Jr, Bacon BR, et al. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection[J]. N Engl J Med,2011,364(13):1195-1206.
[11]
程丹颖, 闫杰, 赵红, 等. 丙型肝炎病毒基因型和抗病毒治疗病毒学应答的相关性研究[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2013,7(3):353-356.
[12]
Cardoso AC, Moucari R, Figueiredo-Mendes C, et al. Impact of peginterferon and ribavirin therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: Incidence and survival in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis[J]. J Hepatol,2010,52(5):652-657.
[13]
Fontanges T. Management of treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) in clinical practice[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol,2011,35(Suppl 2):S64-S68.
[14]
饶慧瑛. 丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗研究进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志,2016,19(4):390-393.
[15]
Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, et al. Ledipasvir andl sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection [J]. N Engl J Med,2014,370(16):1483-1493.
[16]
Ferenci P, Bernstein D, Lalezari J, et al. ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for HCV-l[J]. N Engl J Med,2014,370(21):1983-1992.
[17]
Kumada H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, el al. Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic HCV genotype lb infection[J]. Hepatology,2014,59(6):2083- 2091.
[18]
Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D, et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection[J]. N Engl J Med,2013, 368(20):1878-1887.
[19]
Lawitz E, Sulkowski MS, Ghalib R, et al. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study[J]. Lancet,2014,384(9956):1756-1765.
[20]
Kanda T, Nakamoto S, Nakamura M, et al. Direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection[J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol,2014,2(1):1-6.
[21]
McQuaid T, Savini C, Seyedkazemi S. Sofosbuvir, a significant paradigm change in HCV treatment[J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol,2015,3(1):27-35.
[22]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015[J]. J Hepatol,2015, 63(1):199-236.
[23]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2014[J]. J Hepatol,2014, 61(2):373-395.
[24]
Barsa JE, Branch AD, Schiano TD. A pleasant dilemma to have:to treat the HCV patient on the waiting list or to treat post-liver transplantation?[J]. Clin Transplant,2015,29(10):859-865.
[25]
Pawlotsky JM. New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges[J]. Gastroenterology,2014,146(5):1176-1192.
[1] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[2] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[7] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[8] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[9] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[12] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
[14] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要