切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 363 -366. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2016.03.024

临床论著

临床干预对妊娠期梅毒患者妊娠结局的影响
朱俊芹1,(), 于海伦1   
  1. 1. 255400 淄博市,淄博市临淄区人民医院产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-19 出版日期:2016-06-15
  • 通信作者: 朱俊芹

Analysis on impact of clinical intervention for syphilis in pregnant on pregnancy outcome

Junqin Zhu1,(), Hailun Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Linzi District People’s Hospital, Zibo 255400, China
  • Received:2015-07-19 Published:2016-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Junqin Zhu
引用本文:

朱俊芹, 于海伦. 临床干预对妊娠期梅毒患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(03): 363-366.

Junqin Zhu, Hailun Yu. Analysis on impact of clinical intervention for syphilis in pregnant on pregnancy outcome[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(03): 363-366.

目的

探讨对妊娠期梅毒患者采取临床干预对妊娠结局的影响,为妊娠期梅毒孕妇的临床治疗提供参考。

方法

选取2010年1月至2015年1月本院收治的90例妊娠期梅毒孕妇,根据其临床干预的时间,首次筛查时快速血浆反应素环状卡片试验(RPR)的滴度及孕期梅毒治疗情况进行分组,并对其妊娠结局进行比较。

结果

妊娠期梅毒患者孕20周前(65例)和孕20周后(15例)进行临床干预,不良妊娠结局(流产、早产、死胎死产、先天梅毒等)发生率分别是3.08%和20%,差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 7. 521、P = 0.012)。90例梅毒孕妇根据孕期治疗情况,分为规范治疗组(60例)、不规范治疗组(20例)和未治疗组(10例),不良妊娠结局发生率分别为1.67%(1/60)、20%(4/20)和60%(6/10),三组差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 13.863、P = 0.001);80例采取临床干预的妊娠期梅毒孕妇根据首次筛查时RPR滴度分为≤ 1︰4(66例)和≥ 1︰8(14例)两组,RPR滴度≤ 1︰4组不良妊娠结局发生率为1.52%(1/66),显著低于RPR滴度≥ 1︰8组的孕妇不良结局发生率28.57%(4/14),差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 8.102、P = 0.011)。

结论

对妊娠期梅毒患者的早期诊断、规范性治疗,可显著改善妊娠结局,提高出生人口质量。

Objective

To investigate the impact of clinical interventions for the pregnant patients with syphilis on pregnancy, and to provide guidance for clinical treatment of syphilis infection in the pregnant women.

Methods

Total of 90 cases of pregnant women infected with syphilis in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2015 were enroelled, according to clinical intervention time, the first screening of RPR titers and treatment of syphilis during pregnancy, they were divided into groups, while the pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (including miscarriage, prematurity, stillbirth and congenial syphilis) before 20 weeks and after 20 weeks of pregnancy were 3.08% and 20.00%, with significant differences (χ2 = 7. 521, P = 0.012). The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes were 1.67% (1/60), 20% (4/20) and 60% (6/10) in the standard treatment group (60 cases), nonstandard treatment group (20 cases) and non-treated group (10 cases), with significant differences (χ2 = 13.863, P = 0.001). Among the 80 cases, there were 66 cases with titer ≤ 1︰4, 14 cases with titer≥ 1︰8. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 1.52% (1/66) in ≤ 1︰4 group, and significantly lower than that of ≥ 1︰8 group which was 28.57% (4/14), with significant differences (χ2 = 8.102, P = 0.011).

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and standard treatment of syphilis in pregnant women could improve the pregnancy outcome and the quality of birth population.

表1 干预时机与不良妊娠结局情况[例(%)]
表2 治疗方案与不良妊娠结局情况[例(%)]
表3 妊娠期梅毒孕妇首诊临床干预时RPR滴度与不良妊娠结局情况[例(%)]
1
Pinto VM, Tancredi MV, De Alencar H D, et al. Prevalence of syphilis and associated factors in homeless people of Sao Paulo, Brazil, using a Rapid Test[J]. Revista Brasileira De Epidemiologia,2014,17(2):341-354.
2
李彦,李振鲁,杨雪源. 老年患者梅毒感染分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2014,2(8):1958-1959, 1977.
3
Soeiro CM, Miranda AE, Saraceni V, et al. Syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis in Amazonas State, Brazil: an evaluation using database linkage[J]. Cad Saude Publica,2014,30(4):715-723.
4
Chen XS, Peeling RW, Yin YP, et al. Improving antenatal care to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by syphilis[J]. Future Microbiol,2011,6(10):1131-1134.
5
王千秋,张国成主编. 性传播疾病临床诊疗指南[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社,2007:1-2.
6
张荣莲,陈起燕,陈烈平, 等. 妊娠合并梅毒患者的母婴传播规律与干预方法[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(7):438-442.
7
谢幸,苟文丽主编. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2013:102.
8
Hawkes S, Matin N, Broutet N, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve screening for syphilis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. The Lancet Inf Dis,2011,11(9):684-691.
9
鲁东平,王芬,张荣, 等. 深圳市宝安区2008-2009年孕产妇及新生儿梅毒患病情况分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志,2011,2(3):212-214.
10
French P, Gomberg M, Janier M, et al. IUSTI: 2008 European guidelines on the management of syphilis[J]. Int J STD AIDS,2009,20(5):300-309.
11
U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for syphilis infection in pregnancy: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement[J]. Ann intern Med,2009,150(10):705-709.
12
Majeroni BA, Ukkadam S. Screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy[J]. Am Fam Physician,2007,76(2):265-270.
13
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep,2010,59(RR-12):1-110.
14
Kingston M, French P, Goh B, et al. UK National guidelines on the management of syphilis 2008[J]. Int J STD AIDS,2008,19(11):729-740.
15
The Central Research Institute for Skin and Venereal Disease, Moscow. Syphilis treatment recommendation for Russian Federation[J]. Int J STD AIDS,2001,12(Suppl 3):22-26.
16
Kamb ML, Newman LM, Riley PL, et al. A road map for the global elimination of congenital syphilis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Int,2010,2010(pii):312798.
17
World Health Organization (2007). The global elimination of congenital syphilis: rationale and strategy for action. Geneva: World Health Organization[EB/OL].

URL    
18
Tucker JD, Cohen MS. China’s syphilis epidemic: epidemiology, proximate determinants of spread, and control responses[J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis,2011,24:50-55.
19
樊尚荣,单莹莹,董悦. 妊娠期感染性疾病.//曹泽毅主编. 中华妇产科学. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2014:665-680.
20
樊尚荣. 中华医学会妇产科分会感染性疾病协作组.妊娠合并梅毒诊断和治疗专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2012,39(6):430-431.
21
Alexander JM, Sheffield JS, Sanchez PJ, et al. Efficacy of treatment for syphilis in pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol,1999,93:5-8.
22
Liu JB, Hong FC, Pan P, et al. A risk model for congenital syphilis in infants born to mothers with syphilis treated in gestation: a prospective cohort study[J]. Sex Transm Infect,2010,86(4):292-296.
23
王临虹,王玲,王爱玲, 等. 先天梅毒防治指南[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志,2010,7(1)4:185-188.
24
张荣莲,陈烈平,陈起燕, 等. 45 529例孕产妇妊娠期梅毒流行病学调查研究[J]. 中国自然医学杂志,2007,8(9):289-292.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 刘艳艳, 谭曦, 彭雪. 妊娠合并膀胱低度恶性潜能乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 212-218.
[10] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[11] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[13] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[15] 郑晓芳, 魏宋荃, 黄真轩, 吴文诗, 李桂民, 张红霞, 江庆萍, 陈敦金, 余琳. 子痫前期合并胎儿生长受限的妊娠结局及胎盘病理改变的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 85-92.
阅读次数
全文


摘要