切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 328 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2019.04.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

2型糖尿病合并血流感染者临床特征和病原菌分布
庄晓晶1,(), 丁海燕1, 林晓荣1   
  1. 1. 215625 苏州市,张家港市第六人民医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-06 出版日期:2019-08-15
  • 通信作者: 庄晓晶

Clinical characteristics and distribution of pathogens in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with bloodstream infection

Xiaojing Zhuang1,(), Haiyan Ding1, Xiaorong Lin1   

  1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, the Sixth People’s Hospital of Zhangjiagang City, Suzhou 215625, China
  • Received:2019-01-06 Published:2019-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojing Zhuang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhuang Xiaojing, Email:
引用本文:

庄晓晶, 丁海燕, 林晓荣. 2型糖尿病合并血流感染者临床特征和病原菌分布[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 328-333.

Xiaojing Zhuang, Haiyan Ding, Xiaorong Lin. Clinical characteristics and distribution of pathogens in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with bloodstream infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 328-333.

目的

分析2型糖尿病合并血流感染者的临床特征和病原菌分布,探讨更有效和便捷的治疗方式。

方法

回顾性分析2014年4月至2018年4月于张家港市第六人民医院诊治的92例2型糖尿病合并血流感染者临床特征、病原菌分布及药敏特征,并采用Cox回归法分析影响2型糖尿病合并血流感染预后的危险因素。

结果

92例2型糖尿病合并血流感染者以体重指数(BMI)< 18.5 kg/m2(47/92、51.09%)、中低热(29/92、72.82%)、发热持续时间≥ 7 d(62/92、67.39%)、病程≥ 10 d(68/92、73.91%)、皮肤感染(50/92、54.35%)和住院时间≥ 15 d(53/92、57.61%)为主,治愈率为84.78%(78/92)。血培养结果显示,革兰阳性菌感染23例(25.00%),以金黄色葡萄球菌(8/92、8.70%)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(7/92、7.61%)为主;革兰阴性菌感染69例(75.00%),以大肠埃希菌(32/92、34.79%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(14/92、15.22%)为主。药敏试验结果显示,金黄色葡萄球菌敏感药物主要为万古霉素、庆大霉素和克林霉素,敏感性分别为100.00%(8/8)、75.00%(6/8)和50.00%(4/8);凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌敏感药物主要为万古霉素和克林霉素,敏感性分别为100.00%(7/7)和57.14%(4/7);大肠埃希菌敏感药物主要为哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和氨曲南,敏感性分别为96.88%(31/32)和90.63%(29/32);肺炎克雷伯菌敏感药物主要为哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和头孢替坦,敏感性分别为92.86%(13/14)和85.72%(12/14)。Cox回归单因素分析结果显示,HbA1c(P < 0.001)、BMI > 23.9 kg/m2P = 0.03)、高热(P = 0.08)、发热持续时间≥ 7 d(P = 0.09)、病程≥ 10 d(P = 0.09)及多器官功能衰竭(P < 0.001)均为影响预后的危险因素(单因素纳入标准为P < 0.1);Cox回归多因素分析示HbA1c(P = 0.01)和多器官功能衰竭(P < 0.001)为影响2型糖尿病合并血流感染预后的独立危险因素。

结论

2型糖尿病合并血流感染以血糖控制不佳、高BMI、持续中低热、病程长、皮肤感染、住院时间长为主要临床特征;多为革兰阴性菌感染,且耐药严重,临床须尽早完成血培养及药敏试验,以指导临床合理用药。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics and pathogenic bacteria distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with bloodstream infection, and to provide more effective and convenient treatment.

Methods

The clinical characteristics, pathogenic bacteria distribution and drug sensitivity of 92 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with blood flow infection treated in the Sixth People’s Hospital of Zhangjiagang City from April 2014 to April 2018 were analyzed, retrospectively; while the risk factors influencing the prognosis of type 2 diabetes complicated with blood flow infection were analyzed by Cox regression.

Results

The 92 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with blood flow infection were mainly with body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 (47/92, 51.09%), moderate and low fever (29/92, 72.82%), fever duration ≥ 7 d (62/92, 67.39%), course of disease ≥ 10 d (68/92, 73.91%), skin infection (50/92, 54.35%) and length hospitalization ≥ 15 d (53/92, 57.61%). The cure rate was only 84.78% (78/92). The results of blood culture showed that 23 cases (25.00%) were with Gram-positive bacteria infection, mainly Staphylococcus aureus (8/92, 8.70%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (7/92, 7.61%); 69 cases (75.00%) were with Gram-negative bacteria infection, mainly Escherichia coli (32/92, 34.79%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14/92, 15.22%). The results of drug susceptibility test showed that Staphylococcus aureus sensitive drugs were mainly vancomycin, gentamicin and clindamycin, with the sensitivity of 100.00% (8/8), 75.00% (6/8) and 50.00% (4/8), respectively. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci sensitive drugs were mainly vancomycin and clindamycin, with the sensitivity of 100.00% (7/7) and 57.14% (4/7), respectively. Escherichia coli sensitive drugs were mainly piperacillin/tazobactam and aztreonam, with the sensitivity were 96.88% (31/32) and 90.63% (29/32), respectively. The sensitive drug of Klebsiella pneumoniae were piperazepine/zuobatan and ceftitam, with the sensitivity were 92.86% (13/14) and 85.72% (12/14), respectively. Cox regression univariate analysis showed that HbA1c (P < 0.001), BMI > 23.9 kg/m2 (P = 0.03), high fever (P = 0.08), fever duration≥ 7 d (P = 0.09), course of disease ≥ 10 days (P = 0.09) and multiple organ failure (P < 0.001) were all risk factors affecting the prognosis (univariate inclusion criteria were P < 0.1). Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that HbA1c (P = 0.01) and multiple organ failure (P < 0.001) were both independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with bloodstream infection.

Conclusions

The main clinical features of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with bloodstream infection were poor blood sugar control, high BMI, persistent low and moderate fever, long course of disease, skin infection and long hospitalization. Most of the patients were with Gram-negative bacterial infection and serious drug resistance. Blood culture and drug sensitivity should be completed as soon as possible in order to guide rational drug use in clinic.

表1 92例2型糖尿病合并血流感染者临床特征
表2 2型糖尿病合并血流感染者血培养病原菌分析
表3 所分离主要革兰阴性菌的药敏试验[株(%)]
表4 所分离主要革兰阳性菌的药敏试验[株(%)]
表5 2型糖尿病合并血流感染预后Cox回归分析
[1]
Antosik K, Borowiec M. Genetic factors of diabetes[J]. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz),2016,64(Suppl 1):157-160.
[2]
汪会琴, 胡如英, 武海滨, 等. 2型糖尿病报告发病率研究进展[J]. 浙江预防医学,2016,28(1):37-39.
[3]
殷峻. 糖尿病合并感染的防治策略[J]. 中华内科杂志,2016,55(11):883-885.
[4]
Chakraborty S, Bhattacharyya R, Banerjee D. Infections: A possible risk factor for type 2 diabetes[J]. Adv Clin Chem,2017,80(3):227-251.
[5]
翟群超, 叶山东. 2型糖尿病合并血流感染研究进展[J]. 安徽医学,2016,37(9):1176-1178.
[6]
Bell T, O’Grady NP. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am,2017,31(3):551-559.
[7]
McKane CK, Marmarelis M, Mendu ML, et al. Diabetes mellitus and community-acquired bloodstream infections in the critically ill[J]. J Crit Care,2014,29(1):70-76.
[8]
Saleh HM, Tawfik MM, Abouellail H. Prospective, randomized study of long-term hemodialysis catheter removal versus guidewire exchange to treat catheter-related bloodstream infection[J]. J Vasc Surg,2017,66(5):1427-1431.
[9]
葛均波, 徐永健. 内科学[M]. 8版. 人民卫生出版社,2013.
[10]
李兰娟, 王宇明. 感染病学[M]. 3版. 人民卫生出版社,2015.
[11]
Scannapieco FA, Cantos A. Oral inflammation and infection, and chronic medical diseases: implications for the elderly[J]. Periodontol 2000,2016,72(1):153-175.
[12]
柏淑禹, 张伟. 老年患者医院获得性血流感染的临床回顾性研究[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2016,35(8):871-875.
[13]
Sato J, Kanazawa A, Watada H. Type 2 diabetes and bacteremia[J]. Ann Nutr Metab,2017,71(Suppl 1):17-22.
[14]
薛建红, 吴永友, 顾伯林, 等. 老年糖尿病患者肺部感染与免疫功能相关性研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2017,27(21):4873-4876.
[15]
Szablewski L. Role of immune system in type 1 diabetes mellitus pathogenesis[J]. Int Immunopharmacol,2014,22(1):182-191.
[16]
Szablewski L, Sulima A. The structural and functional changes of blood cells and molecular components in diabetes mellitus[J]. Biol Chem,2017,398(4):411-423.
[17]
柏淑禹, 王颖捷, 苏爱梅. 老年病房院内革兰氏阴性杆菌血流感染的临床分析[J]. 实用老年医学,2016,30(10):844-846.
[18]
Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C, et al. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2016,37(1):88-99.
[19]
严明. 我院血培养阳性血流感染患者临床特点和治疗效果分析[D]. 重庆医科大学,2016.
[20]
Dubourg G, Raoult D. Emerging methodologies for pathogen identification in positive blood culture testing[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn,2016,16(1):97-111.
[21]
翟群超, 叶山东, 黄海泉, 等. 2型糖尿病合并血流感染的病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2015,23(12):1084-1087.
[22]
Boyles TH, Davis K, Crede T, et al. Blood cultures taken from patients attending emergency departments in South Africa are an important antibiotic stewardship tool, which directly influences patient management[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2015,8(15):410-416.
[23]
翟如波, 李云慧, 孙跃岭, 等. 某院连续三年医院血流感染病原菌分布特征及耐药性分析[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2016,10(1):36-40.
[24]
刘德华, 张红娟, 杜艳, 等. 14 519例血流感染病原菌构成及耐药分析[J]. 中国抗生素杂志,2016,41(2):137-143.
[25]
查翔远, 宋有良, 金正胜, 等. 老年血流感染患者107例病原菌分布和药敏分析[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志,2017,17(1):77-81.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[3] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[4] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[5] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[9] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[10] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[11] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[12] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要